Payments for Carbon Sequestration to Alleviate Development Pressure in a Rapidly Urbanizing Region

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Forest Science

• Publication date

  2017-06-05

• Fields of study

  Business, Economics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.5849/FS-2016-084R1
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation

  2016cited by this paper
• Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowner Beliefs Toward Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration in the Southern United States

  2016cited by this paper
• For the Love of the Land: Generational Land Transfer and the Future of Family Forests in Western Washington State, USA

  2016cited by this paper
• Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy

  2015cited by this paper
• Simulating urbanization scenarios reveals tradeoffs between conservation planning strategies

  2015influential reference
• Changing decisions in a changing landscape: How might forest owners in an urbanizing region respond to emerging bioenergy markets?

  2015influential reference
• Family Forest Owners of the United States, 2006

  2015cited by this paper
• Spatially and socially segmenting private landowner motivations, properties, and management: A typology for the wildland urban interface

  2015cited by this paper
• Payments for Ecosystem Services: Will a New Hook Net More Active Family Forest Owners?

  2015influential reference
• Family Forest Owner Preferences for Forest Conservation Programs: A New York Case Study

  2015influential reference
• For the Love of the Land: Generational Land Transfer and the Future of Family Forests in Western Washington State, USA

  2015cited by this paper
• Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Feedbacks in Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS) A mixed-methods analysis of social-ecological feedbacks between urbanization and forest persistence

  2014influential reference
• The Southern Megalopolis: Using the Past to Predict the Future of Urban Sprawl in the Southeast U.S

  2014cited by this paper
• Family Forest Landowners’ Interest in Forest Carbon Offset Programs: Focus Group Findings from the Lake States, USA

  2014cited by this paper
• Carbon Storage on Non-industrial Private Forestland: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

  2013cited by this paper
• An Exploration of African American Forest Landowners in Mississippi

  2013cited by this paper
• Carbon markets 15 years after Kyoto: Lessons learned, new challenges

  2013cited by this paper
• Small forest landowner preferences for working forest conservation contract attributes: A case of Washington State, USA

  2013cited by this paper
• Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions

  2013cited by this paper
• What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension

  2013cited by this paper
• FUTURES: Multilevel Simulations of Emerging Urban–Rural Landscape Structure Using a Stochastic Patch-Growing Algorithm

  2013cited by this paper
• An assessment of forest landowner interest in selling forest carbon credits in the Lake States, USA

  2012cited by this paper
• Examining the direct and indirect effects of environmental change and place attachment on land management decisions in the Hill Country of Texas, USA

  2012cited by this paper
• Factors Affecting the Attitudes of Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners Regarding Carbon Sequestration and Trading

  2012cited by this paper
• LiDAR-Landsat data fusion for large-area assessment of urban land cover: Balancing spatial resolution, data volume and mapping accuracy

  2012cited by this paper
• Estimated participation in U.S. carbon sequestration programs: A study of NIPF landowners in Massachusetts

  2012influential reference
• The Diverse Values and Motivations of Family Forest Owners in the United States: An Analysis of an Open-ended Question in the National Woodland Owner Survey

  2011cited by this paper
• Motivations for land protection and stewardship: Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts

  2011cited by this paper
• Foresters' Perceptions of Family Forest Owner Willingness to Participate in Forest Carbon Markets

  2011cited by this paper
• Barriers to Massachusetts forest landowner participation in carbon markets

  2011influential reference
• What should we call instruments commonly known as payments for environmental services? A review of the literature and a proposal

  2011influential reference
• Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services

  2010cited by this paper
• Internet, mail, and mixed‐mode surveys: The tailored design method

  2010influential reference
• Forest landowners' willingness to sell carbon credits: a pilot study.

  2009influential reference
• Carbon banking: Creating flexibility for forest owners

  2009cited by this paper
• Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues

  2008influential reference
• Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms

  2008cited by this paper
• Will either cap and trade or a carbon emissions tax be effective in monetizing carbon as an ecosystem service

  2008cited by this paper
• Multivariate Data Analysis

  2007influential reference
• The Influence of Financial Incentive Programs in Promoting Sustainable Forestry on the Nation's Family Forests

  2007cited by this paper
• Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface

  2007cited by this paper
• A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties.

  2006cited by this paper
• Thoreau, Muir, and Jane Doe: Different Types of Private Forest Owners Need Different Kinds of Forest Management

  2006influential reference
• Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments

  2006cited by this paper
• How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load

  2006cited by this paper
• Economics and Land‐Use Change in Prioritizing Private Land Conservation

  2005influential reference
• EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS

  2005cited by this paper
• Landscape Patterns of Exurban Growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020

  2005cited by this paper
• Creating Markets for Ecosystem Services: Notes from the Field

  2005cited by this paper
• Economic benefits of biodiversity exceed costs of conservation at an African rainforest reserve.

  2005cited by this paper
• Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States

  2004cited by this paper
• Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems

  2004cited by this paper
• The social aspects of landscape change: protecting open space under the pressure of development

  2004cited by this paper
• Assessing the impacts of alternative 'Opt-out' formats in choice experiment studies: Consumer preferences for genetically modified content and production information in food

  2003cited by this paper
• The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice

  2003influential reference
• PVF: A Scale to Measure Public Values of Forests

  2003cited by this paper
• Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment

  2003cited by this paper
• Toward a Social Psychology of Place

  2002cited by this paper
• Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?

  2002cited by this paper
• Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency

  2002cited by this paper
• Land‐Use Dynamics Beyond the American Urban Fringe*

  2001cited by this paper
• Streams in the Urban Landscape

  2001cited by this paper
• The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation

  2001cited by this paper
• Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications

  2000cited by this paper
• Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics

  2000cited by this paper
• MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE

  2000cited by this paper
• Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat

  1997cited by this paper
• Identifying NIPF Management Motivations with Qualitative Methods

  1989cited by this paper
• Econometric analysis of qualitative response models

  1984cited by this paper
• Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures

  1981cited by this paper
• Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior

  1972cited by this paper

• Preferences for a payment for ecosystem services program to control forest fires in Burkina Faso: A choice experiment

  2023cites this paper
• Socio-spatial factors influence climate change adaptation decisions of rural coastal landowners

  2023cites this paper
• Forest carbon incentive programs for non-industrial private forests in Oregon (USA): Impacts of program design on willingness to enroll and landscape-scale program outcomes

  2022cites this paper
• Common preferences of European small-scale forest owners towards contract-based management

  2022cites this paper
• Forest owners' preferences for contract-based management to enhance environmental values versus timber production

  2021cites this paper
• Rising Seas and the Changing Coastal Landscape: Modeling Land Change Pattern and Social Process to Quantify the Socio-Ecological Impacts of Sea Level Rise.

  2018cites this paper
• Bayesian methods to estimate urban growth potential

  2017cites this paper