Stroke Quality Metrics: Systematic Reviews of the Relationships to Patient-Centered Outcomes and Impact of Public Reporting

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Stroke

• Publication date

  2012-01-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.635011PMID 21980213
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Processes of Care and Medical Complications in Patients With Stroke

  2011cited by this paper
• Are Quality Improvements in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program Related to Better Care or Better Data Documentation?

  2011cited by this paper
• Association between stroke center hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke and mortality.

  2011cited by this paper
• Public reporting on hospital process improvements is linked to better patient outcomes.

  2010cited by this paper
• Characteristics, Performance Measures, and In-Hospital Outcomes of the First One Million Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Admissions in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke

  2010cited by this paper
• Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Performance Indicators: Surveillance of Stroke Care in the Taiwan Stroke Registry: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke in Taiwan

  2010cited by this paper
• Development of Stroke Performance Measures: Definitions, Methods, and Current Measures

  2010cited by this paper
• Processes of care associated with acute stroke outcomes.

  2010cited by this paper
• HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES

  2010cited by this paper
• Get With the Guidelines–Stroke Is Associated With Sustained Improvement in Care for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

  2009cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial.

  2009cited by this paper
• Public Reporting of Quality Data for Stroke: Is It Measuring Quality?

  2008cited by this paper
• Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care

  2008cited by this paper
• Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey

  2008cited by this paper
• Reductions in Mortality Associated With Intensive Public Reporting of Hospital Outcomes

  2008cited by this paper
• Quality of Care and Mortality Among Patients With Stroke: A Nationwide Follow-up Study

  2008cited by this paper
• Stroke Units in Their Natural Habitat: Systematic Review of Observational Studies

  2007cited by this paper
• Association between performance measures and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized with heart failure.

  2007cited by this paper
• The Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry: initial results from four prototypes.

  2006cited by this paper
• Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality.

  2006cited by this paper
• Public report cards--cardiac surgery and beyond.

  2006cited by this paper
• Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates.

  2006cited by this paper
• The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study

  2005cited by this paper
• Do the Brain Attack Coalition’s criteria for stroke centers improve care for ischemic stroke?

  2005cited by this paper
• Comparing processes of stroke care in high- and low-mortality hospitals in the West Midlands, UK.

  2005cited by this paper
• The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

  2005cited by this paper
• Superiority trials, non-inferiority trials, and prisoners of the 2-sided null hypothesis

  2004cited by this paper
• Patients at the center: in our practice, and in our use of language.

  2004cited by this paper
• Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma.

  2004cited by this paper
• Relationship Between Process and Outcome in Stroke Care

  2003cited by this paper
• Connections Between Quality Measurement and Improvement

  2003cited by this paper
• Stroke care: how do we measure quality?

  2002cited by this paper
• Guideline Compliance Improves Stroke Outcome: A Preliminary Study in 4 Districts in the Italian Region of Lombardia

  2002cited by this paper
• Adherence to Postacute Rehabilitation Guidelines Is Associated With Functional Recovery in Stroke

  2002cited by this paper
• Structure, Process, and Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation

  2002cited by this paper
• Postacute stroke guideline compliance is associated with greater patient satisfaction.

  2002cited by this paper
• Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century

  2001cited by this paper
• Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, II: observational studies.

  2001cited by this paper
• Towards a National System for Monitoring the Quality of Hospital-Based Stroke Services

  2001cited by this paper
• Brave New Brain: Conquering Mental Illness in the Era of the Genome

  2001cited by this paper
• Measuring and improving quality of care: a report from the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Assessment of Healthcare Quality in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.

  2000cited by this paper
• Measuring and improving quality of care : A report from the american heart Association/American college of cardiology first scientific forum on assessment of healthcare quality in cardiovascular disease and stroke

  2000cited by this paper
• The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence.

  2000cited by this paper
• Is in-hospital stroke mortality an accurate measure of quality of care?

  1998cited by this paper
• How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration.

  1997cited by this paper
• Confounding by indication.

  1996cited by this paper
• Why it is Important to Demonstrate Linkages Between Outcomes of Care and Processes and Structures of Care

  1995cited by this paper
• Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction

  1995cited by this paper
• Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.

  1990cited by this paper
• On measuring quality.

  1988cited by this paper
• Hospital Inpatient Mortality

  1987cited by this paper
• Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality?

  1987cited by this paper
• ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Association Between Hospital Process Performance and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Setting benchmark for ischemic stroke treated endovascularly: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2026cites this paper
• Correlation between mRankin scale at 3 months and mTICI score? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression on randomized controlled trials and registries.

  2025cites this paper
• Time-Sensitive Quality Metrics of Acute Stroke Care: A Comprehensive Stroke Center Experience

  2024cites this paper
• Quality Metrics in Acute Stroke: Time to Own

  2023cites this paper
• Temporal Changes in Quality Indicators in a Regional System of Care After Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

  2023cites this paper
• Measuring Stroke Quality: Methodological Considerations in Selecting, Defining, and Analyzing Quality Measures

  2022cites this paper
• Quality of acute ischemic stroke care at a tertiary Hospital in Ghana

  2022cites this paper
• Quality measurement for cardiovascular diseases and cancer in hospital value-based healthcare: a systematic review of the literature

  2022cites this paper
• Utilization of Telestroke Prior to and Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

  2022cites this paper
• Measuring Quality of Public Hospitals in Croatia Using a Multi-Criteria Approach

  2021cites this paper
• Association Between Adherence to Quality Indicators and 7-Day In-Hospital Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke

  2020cites this paper
• Unintended Consequences of Obstetric Quality Metrics-Do Not Throw the Baby Out With the Bathwater.

  2020cites this paper
• Acute ischemic stroke: improving access to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator

  2020cites this paper
• Setting performance benchmarks for stroke care delivery: Which quality indicators should be prioritized in quality improvement; an analysis in 500,331 stroke admissions

  2020cites this paper
• Identifying Approaches Used in the Analysis and Reporting of Health-system Performance that Have Been Effective at Driving Continuous Improvement and Accountability

  2020cites this paper
• Stroke Center Certification Is Associated With Improved Guideline Concordance

  2019cites this paper
• Recommendations for the Establishment of Stroke Systems of Care: A 2019 Update.

  2019cites this paper
• Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards

  2019cites this paper
• Implementing stroke unit care in selected hospitals in Rwanda

  2019cites this paper
• Lifting the veil on stroke outcomes: revisiting stroke centers’ transparency through public reporting of metrics

  2018cites this paper
• Relationship between hospital performance measures and outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective cohort study

  2018cites this paper
• Impact of code stroke on thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke at a secondary referral hospital in Taiwan

  2018cites this paper
• Evidence-Based Performance Measures and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Findings From the China National Stroke Registry

  2018cites this paper
• Stroke Performance Measures Do Not Predict Functional Outcome

  2017cites this paper
• Reconsidering Hospital Readmission Measures.

  2017cites this paper
• Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  2017cites this paper
• Therapy on stroke units : an ethnographic study

  2017cites this paper
• Trends in Transient Ischemic Attack Hospitalizations in the United States

  2016cites this paper
• Hemicraniectomy versus medical treatment with large MCA infarct: a review and meta-analysis

  2016cites this paper
• Telestroke as a Component of Stroke Systems of Care

  2016cites this paper
• Regulatory Impact on Thrombosis Treatment, Prevention, and Anticoagulant Use.

  2016cites this paper
• Longer procedural times are independently associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke undergoing thrombectomy

  2016cites this paper
• Comparing Vessel Imaging: Noncontrast Computed Tomography/Computed Tomographic Angiography Should Be the New Minimum Standard in Acute Disabling Stroke

  2016cites this paper
• A cluster-randomised quality improvement study to improve two inpatient stroke quality indicators

  2015cites this paper
• Long-Term Effect of Fee-For-Service–Based Reimbursement Cuts on Processes and Outcomes of Care for Stroke: Interrupted Time-Series Study From Taiwan

  2015cites this paper
• Models of care for people with severe acquired brain injury: A systematic review

  2015cites this paper
• Regulatory, legislative, and policy updates with anticoagulant use

  2015cites this paper
• Implementing a Simple Care Bundle Is Associated With Improved Outcomes in a National Cohort of Patients With Ischemic Stroke

  2015cites this paper
• An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke

  2015cites this paper
• Processes and outcomes of ischemic stroke care: the influence of hospital level of care.

  2015cites this paper
• Risk Adjustment of Ischemic Stroke Outcomes for Comparing Hospital Performance: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

  2014cites this paper
• Organising health care services for people with an acquired brain injury: an overview of systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials

  2014cites this paper
• Main barriers to effective implementation of stroke care pathways in France: a qualitative study

  2014cites this paper
• The patient experience: measuring the quality of care in the Defence Medical Services

  2014cites this paper
• Measuring stroke care and quality in routine data sets.

  2013cites this paper
• Use of care management practices in small- and medium-sized physician groups: do public reporting of physician quality and financial incentives matter?

  2013cites this paper
• Associations between the organisation of stroke services, process of care, and mortality in England: prospective cohort study

  2013cites this paper
• Metric-driven harm: an exploration of unintended consequences of performance measurement.

  2013cites this paper
• Primary and Comprehensive Stroke Centers: History, Value and Certification Criteria

  2013cites this paper
• Treatment decisions after severe stroke: uncertainty and biases.

  2012cites this paper
• AHA Scientific Statement

  year unknowncites this paper