Too Many Referrals of Low-Risk Women for BRCA1/2 Genetic Services by Family Physicians

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention

• Publication date

  2008-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2879PMID 18990739PMCID PMC2772063
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Translational Research and Good Behavior

  2007cited by this paper
• Behind closed doors: management of patient expectations in primary care practices.

  2007cited by this paper
• Current Processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Refining Evidence-Based Recommendation Development

  2007cited by this paper
• Point: Genetic Risk Feedback for Common Disease—Time to Test the Waters

  2007cited by this paper
• Sources of Variation in Physician Adherence with Clinical Guidelines: Results from a Factorial Experiment

  2007cited by this paper
• Access to Mental Health Treatment by English Language Proficiency and Race/Ethnicity

  2007cited by this paper
• Anticipating dissemination of cancer genomics in public health: A theoretical approach to psychosocial and behavioral challenges

  2007cited by this paper
• National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 summary.

  2006cited by this paper
• Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility.

  2006cited by this paper
• Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: Evaluating the impact of a direct-to-consumer marketing campaign on physicians' knowledge and practices

  2006cited by this paper
• Facilitating Informed Decision Making about Breast Cancer Risk and Genetic Counseling Among Women Calling the NCI's Cancer Information Service

  2005cited by this paper
• Invitation to a dialogue between researchers and clinicians about evidence-based behavioral medicine

  2005cited by this paper
• Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

  2005cited by this paper
• Adjusting the estimated proportion of breast cancer cases associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: Public health implications

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization.

  2005cited by this paper
• Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Recommendation Statement

  2005cited by this paper
• Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organization: A naturally-occurring experiment

  2005influential reference
• Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians

  2005cited by this paper
• Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

  2005cited by this paper
• Influence of patients' requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial.

  2005cited by this paper
• Realizing the promise of genomics in biomedical research.

  2005cited by this paper
• Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Recommendation Statement

  2005cited by this paper
• Increasing the accuracy of perceived breast cancer risk: results from a randomized trial with Cancer Information Service callers.

  2004cited by this paper
• Genetic research and health disparities.

  2004cited by this paper
• Genetic testing and pharmacogenomics: issues for determining the impact to healthcare delivery and costs.

  2004cited by this paper
• The Institute of Medicine report "Unequal Treatment": implications for academic health centers.

  2004cited by this paper
• Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing--Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003.

  2004cited by this paper
• Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.

  2004cited by this paper
• Physician use of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: results of a national survey.

  2003cited by this paper
• Direct observation of requests for clinical services in office practice: what do patients want and do they get it?

  2003cited by this paper
• Use of cancer susceptibility testing among primary care physicians

  2003cited by this paper
• Direct-to-consumer advertising: physicians' views of its effects on quality of care and the doctor-patient relationship.

  2003cited by this paper
• Referrals of women with a family history of breast cancer from primary care to cancer genetics services in South East Scotland

  2003cited by this paper
• Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer

  2002cited by this paper
• Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates?

  2000cited by this paper
• Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Alabama's Primary Care Physicians Regarding Cancer Genetics

  2000cited by this paper
• Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

  1999cited by this paper
• GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice.

  1999cited by this paper
• US family physicians' experiences with practice guidelines.

  1998cited by this paper
• The Institute of Medicine Report

  1991cited by this paper

• Patterns of referrals to regional clinical genetics services for women potentially at above-population level risk of breast cancer

  2024cites this paper
• Digital innovation for cancer risk assessment allows large-scale service redevelopment of regional cancer genetics service delivery

  2024cites this paper
• Phenotype-Driven Molecular Genetic Test Recommendation for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Disorders

  2023cites this paper
• Interpretation and management of genetic test results by Canadian family physicians: a multiple choice survey of performance

  2021cites this paper
• BRCA testing in unaffected young women in the United States, 2006‐2017

  2020cites this paper
• Opportunities for education and learning in primary care genomics

  2020cites this paper
• Adherence to referral guidelines

  2019cites this paper
• Physicians’ Awareness and Utilization of Genetic Services in Texas

  2018cites this paper
• A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians’ genetic testing practices

  2018cites this paper
• The experience of physicians in pharmacogenomic clinical decision support within eight German university hospitals.

  2017cites this paper
• Breast and ovarian cancer referrals to the ACT Genetic Service: are we meeting guidelines?

  2017cites this paper
• Primary care providers’ cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda

  2017cites this paper
• Use of BRCA Mutation Test in the U.S., 2004-2014.

  2017cites this paper
• Primary care providers’ cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda

  2016cites this paper
• Public Health Approaches and Barriers to Educating Providers about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

  2016cites this paper
• What is the evidence on interventions to manage referral from primary to specialist non-emergency care? A systematic review and logic model synthesis

  2015cites this paper
• The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes

  2015cites this paper
• Health psychology and translational genomic research: bringing innovation to cancer-related behavioral interventions.

  2015cites this paper
• Texas Physicians' Awareness and Utilization of Genetic Services

  2015cites this paper
• The structure and demographic correlates of cancer fear

  2014cites this paper
• Cancer genetics and genomics: essentials for oncology nurses.

  2014cites this paper
• Personal genomic information management and personalized medicine: challenges, current solutions, and roles of HIM professionals.

  2014cites this paper
• Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

  2013cites this paper
• Are public health professionals prepared for public health genomics? A cross-sectional survey in Italy

  2013cites this paper
• Attitudes and Practices Among Internists Concerning Genetic Testing

  2013cites this paper
• Knowledge, attitudes and behavior of physicians regarding predictive genetic tests for breast and colorectal cancer.

  2013cites this paper
• Referral of Patients with Suspected Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome for Genetic Services: A Systematic Review

  2013influential citation
• Pulmonary resections performed at hospitals with thoracic surgery residency programs have superior outcomes.

  2013cites this paper
• Are Family Doctors Compliant with Breast Family History Guidelines

  2013cites this paper
• Performance of BOADICEA and BRCAPRO genetic models and of empirical criteria based on cancer family history for predicting BRCA mutation carrier probabilities: a retrospective study in a sample of Italian cancer genetics clinics.

  2013cites this paper
• Vignette-Based Study of Ovarian Cancer Screening: Do U.S. Physicians Report Adhering to Evidence-Based Recommendations?

  2012cites this paper
• Family History Tools in Primary Care: Does One Size Fit All?

  2012cites this paper
• Patterns of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Randomized Survey of Oregon Clinicians

  2012cites this paper
• Distress and Psychosocial Needs of a Heterogeneous High Risk Familial Cancer Population

  2011cites this paper
• Compliance with professional guidelines with reference to familial cancer services

  2011influential citation
• Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment

  2011cites this paper
• Reported referral for genetic counseling or BRCA 1/2 testing among United States physicians

  2011cites this paper
• Skin Cancer Concerns and Genetic Risk Information-Seeking in Primary Care

  2011cites this paper
• Breast cancer genetic counselling referrals: how comparable are the findings between the UK and the Netherlands?

  2011cites this paper
• Erratum

  2011cites this paper
• Educational needs about cancer family history and genetic counseling for cancer risk among frontline healthcare clinicians in New York City

  2011cites this paper
• Quand demander un avis génétique

  2010cites this paper
• Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.

  2010cites this paper
• Primary care providers’ willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents

  2010cites this paper
• The Case for Personalized Medicine

  2009cites this paper
• Evaluation of a breast/ovarian cancer genetics referral screening tool in a mammography population

  2009cites this paper
• Genetic Services Have Value beyond BRCA1/2 Testing

  2009cites this paper
• Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment and Referral Patterns in Primary Care

  2009cites this paper
• Anticipating dissemination of cancer genomics in public health: A theoretical approach to psychosocial and behavioral challenges

  2007cites this paper