Abstract There are two general views in causal analysis of experimental data: the super population view that the units are an independent sample from some hypothetical infinite population, and the finite population view that the potential outcomes of the experimental units are fixed and the randomness comes solely from the treatment assignment. These two views differs conceptually and mathematically, resulting in different sampling variances of the usual difference-in-means estimator of the average causal effect. Practically, however, these two views result in identical variance estimators. By recalling a variance decomposition and exploiting a completeness-type argument, we establish a connection between these two views in completely randomized experiments. This alternative formulation could serve as a template for bridging finite and super population causal inference in other scenarios.
Bridging Finite and Super Population Causal Inference
Peng Ding,Xinran Li,Luke W. Miratrix
Published 2017 in Journal of Causal Inference
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
Journal of Causal Inference
- Publication date
2017-02-28
- Fields of study
Mathematics
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-35 of 35 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-47 of 47 citing papers · Page 1 of 1