Not so biocentric – Environmental benefits and harm associated with the acceptance of forest management objectives by future environmental professionals

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Ecosystem services

• Publication date

  2018-02-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.12.003
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Service-dominant logic 2025

  2017cited by this paper
• Nudging service providers and assessing service trade-offs to reduce the social inefficiencies of payments for ecosystem services schemes

  2016influential reference
• A service-dominant perspective on payment for ecosystem service offerings

  2016cited by this paper
• Climate Change Mitigation Challenge for Wood Utilization-The Case of Finland.

  2016cited by this paper
• An ecosystem service-dominant logic? - Integrating the ecosystem service approach and the service-dominant logic

  2016influential reference
• Assessing the structure of UK environmental concern and its association with pro-environmental behaviour

  2015cited by this paper
• Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies

  2015cited by this paper
• Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities

  2014cited by this paper
• Forestry in bioeconomy – smart green growth for the humankind

  2014cited by this paper
• Theorizing the Bioeconomy

  2013cited by this paper
• The Awareness of Consequences Scale: An Exploration, Empirical Analysis, and Reinterpretation

  2012cited by this paper
• Do forest owners share the public's values? An application of Schwartz's value theory.

  2012cited by this paper
• Bio-energy and youth: Analyzing the role of school, home, and media from the future policy perspectives

  2011cited by this paper
• Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity

  2011cited by this paper
• Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model

  2011cited by this paper
• Young citizens' knowledge and perceptions of bioenergy and future policy implications

  2010cited by this paper
• Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks

  2010cited by this paper
• New Voices, Old Beliefs: Forest Environmentalism Among New and Long-Standing Rural Residents1

  2010cited by this paper
• Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making

  2009cited by this paper
• The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities.

  2009cited by this paper
• The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation

  2008cited by this paper
• Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust.

  2007cited by this paper
• Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure

  2006cited by this paper
• Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications

  2004cited by this paper
• Non-industrial private forest owners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation

  2004cited by this paper
• Exploring Social Desirability Bias

  2003cited by this paper
• How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question

  2003cited by this paper
• Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?

  2002cited by this paper
• A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services

  2002cited by this paper
• THE STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCERN FOR SELF, OTHER PEOPLE, AND THE BIOSPHERE

  2001cited by this paper
• The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology

  2000cited by this paper
• A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology1

  1999cited by this paper
• A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism

  1999cited by this paper
• A Value-Attitude-Behavior Model Predicting Wildland Preservation Voting Intentions

  1999cited by this paper
• Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland.

  1998cited by this paper
• Opinion of forest owners and the public on forests and their use in Finland

  1996cited by this paper
• The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context

  1995cited by this paper
• The Value Basis of Environmental Concern

  1994cited by this paper
• Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics

  1994cited by this paper
• Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment

  1994cited by this paper
• Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern

  1993influential reference
• The theory of planned behavior

  1991cited by this paper
• Using Multivariate Statistics

  1983cited by this paper
• A Normative Decision Making Model of Altruism

  1981cited by this paper
• THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS

  1978cited by this paper
• Normative Influences on Altruism

  1977cited by this paper
• Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test

  1973cited by this paper

• Non-anthropocentric Environmental Motive Correlates with Personal Environmentalism More Strongly than Anthropocentric Motives: A Meta-analysis

  2025cites this paper
• Gender equality in Nordic forest research – A literature review

  2025cites this paper
• Forest bioeconomy at regional scale: A systematic literature review and future policy perspectives

  2023cites this paper
• Does Educational Profile Influence Student Perception of Ecosystem Service Provision by Blue-Green Infrastructure?

  2023cites this paper
• Private Governance of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Findings From Nordic Forest Companies

  2022cites this paper
• The multitudes of bioeconomies: A systematic review of stakeholders’ bioeconomy perceptions

  2021cites this paper
• Forest Owners’ Satisfaction with Forest Policy

  2021cites this paper
• Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research

  2020cites this paper
• Bioeconomy imaginaries: A review of forest-related social science literature

  2020cites this paper
• Ecosystem Services in the Service-Dominant Logic Framework

  2019cites this paper
• Thinking green, circular or bio: Eliciting researchers' perspectives on a sustainable economy with Q method

  2019cites this paper
• Utilising portfolio theory in environmental research - New perspectives and considerations.

  2019cites this paper
• Changing forest stakeholders’ perception of ecosystem services with linguistic nudging

  2018cites this paper