Abstract The aim of the paper is twofold. First, it presents the fundamental ideas and results of the “metabiology” created by Gregory Chaitin. Second, it shows why metabiology ultimately fails as a candidate for being a proper mathematical model for the theory of evolution by natural selection. Because of genocentric reductionism and biological oversimplifications, metabiology should be perceived rather as an expression of the philosophical worldview of it’s author.
Turing Machines and Evolution. A Critique of Gregory Chaitin’s Metabiology
Published 2016 in Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2016
- Venue
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
- Publication date
2016-12-01
- Fields of study
Philosophy, Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-14 of 14 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-4 of 4 citing papers · Page 1 of 1