Multiple distance cues do not prevent systematic biases in reach to grasp movements

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Psychological Research

• Publication date

  2018-09-27

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00426-018-1101-9PMID 30259095
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Does Depth-Cue Combination Yield Identical Biases in Perception and Grasping?

  2019cited by this paper
• Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension

  2019cited by this paper
• Size matters: How reaching and vergence movements are influenced by the familiar size of stereoscopically presented objects

  2019cited by this paper
• Identifying Cortical Substrates Underlying the Phenomenology of Stereopsis and Realness: A Pilot fMRI Study

  2019cited by this paper
• How removing visual information affects grasping movements

  2018cited by this paper
• On the response function and range dependence of manual estimation

  2018cited by this paper
• Proprioceptive Distance Cues Restore Perfect Size Constancy in Grasping, but Not Perception, When Vision Is Limited.

  2018cited by this paper
• Viewing geometry determines the contribution of binocular vision to the online control of grasping

  2017cited by this paper
• Stereovision for action reflects our perceptual experience of distance and depth.

  2017cited by this paper
• The timescale of adaptation at early and mid-level stages of visual processing.

  2017cited by this paper
• On-line visual control of grasping movements

  2016cited by this paper
• Conscious perception and grasping rely on a shared depth encoding

  2016cited by this paper
• Lack of depth constancy for grasping movements in both virtual and real environments.

  2015cited by this paper
• Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training

  2015cited by this paper
• Effect of visual and haptic feedback on grasping movements.

  2014cited by this paper
• R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

  2014cited by this paper
• A framework for the study of vision in active observers

  2014cited by this paper
• Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.

  2013cited by this paper
• Visuomotor Adaptation Changes Stereoscopic Depth Perception and Tactile Discrimination

  2013cited by this paper
• Perception and Action Without Veridical Metric Reconstruction: An Affine Approach

  2013cited by this paper
• Grasping Kinematics from the Perspective of the Individual Digits: A Modelling Study

  2012cited by this paper
• Interplay between NS3 protease and human La protein regulates translation-replication switch of Hepatitis C virus

  2011cited by this paper
• Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: no evidence for a binocular specialism.

  2011cited by this paper
• Transforming vision into action.

  2011influential reference
• Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects

  2011cited by this paper
• Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension

  2007cited by this paper
• Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping

  2006cited by this paper
• The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping.

  2006cited by this paper
• Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time.

  2005cited by this paper
• Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension

  2004influential reference
• Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion

  2004cited by this paper
• Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

  2003influential reference
• Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension

  2002cited by this paper
• Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action

  2002cited by this paper
• Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension

  2001cited by this paper
• Vertical gaze angle as a distance cue for programming reaching: insights from visual form agnosia II (of III)

  2001cited by this paper
• Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems

  2000cited by this paper
• Perceived distance, shape and size.

  1999influential reference
• A new view on grasping.

  1999cited by this paper
• The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping

  1998cited by this paper
• Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position.

  1997cited by this paper
• The visual perception of three-dimensional length.

  1996cited by this paper
• The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis.

  1992cited by this paper
• Separate visual pathways for perception and action.

  1992cited by this paper
• Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis.

  1991cited by this paper
• The perception of vertical and horizontal distances in outdoor settings

  1988cited by this paper
• The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern.

  1986cited by this paper
• The timing of natural prehension movements.

  1984cited by this paper
• Slope of regard as a distance cue

  1982cited by this paper
• Binocular distance perception.

  1980influential reference

• Pictorial depth cues always influence reaching distance.

  2023cites this paper
• Virtual Reality for Vision Science.

  2023cites this paper
• Perceiving depth from texture and disparity cues: Evidence for a non-probabilistic account of cue integration

  2022cites this paper
• The case against probabilistic inference: a new deterministic theory of 3D visual processing

  2022cites this paper
• Contributions of pictorial and binocular cues to the perception of distance in virtual reality

  2021cites this paper
• Spatial updating of allocentric landmark information in real-time and memory-guided reaching.

  2020cites this paper
• Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension

  2019cites this paper
• Size matters: How reaching and vergence movements are influenced by the familiar size of stereoscopically presented objects

  2019cites this paper
• Identifying Cortical Substrates Underlying the Phenomenology of Stereopsis and Realness: A Pilot fMRI Study

  2019cites this paper