BackgroundEstimated intracranial volume (eTIV) from FreeSurfer is not segmentation-based but calculated from the alignment of the input magnetic resonance (MR) images to the MNI305 brain atlas, an approach that could lead to a bias by total brain volume. If eTIV is unbiased, variance beyond that explained by intracranial volume should be random. Our null hypothesis was that no correlation would remain between eTIV and total brain volume when controlling for intracranial volume.MethodseTIV and total brain volume for 62 participants were calculated on 1.5-T, T1-weighted MR images using FreeSurfer (version 6.0.0). Manual delineations of the intracranial volume were also made for the same images. To evaluate the null hypothesis, the partial correlation between eTIV and total brain volume was calculated when controlling for intracranial volume.ResultsThe partial correlation between eTIV and total brain volume when controlling for intracranial volume was 0.355 (p = 0.026). The null hypothesis was rejected.ConclusioneTIV from FreeSurfer is biased by total brain volume.
Estimated intracranial volume from FreeSurfer is biased by total brain volume
Niklas Klasson,E. Olsson,C. Eckerström,H. Malmgren,A. Wallin
Published 2018 in European Radiology Experimental
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
European Radiology Experimental
- Publication date
2018-09-19
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-24 of 24 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-43 of 43 citing papers · Page 1 of 1