Abstract Thematic maps are important for a range of disciplines including spatial planning and ecosystem status assessments. Despite an increasing focus on accuracy assessment methods to ensure maps are fit for purpose, the adoption of these recommendations has not been widespread. We present a methodology which utilises bootstrap aggregation and adheres to recommended practices for accuracy assessments. Furthermore, additional information is extracted from the model outputs to produce spatial maps of confidence also supporting map interpretation. The methodology has been applied to two study sites using both pixel-based and object-based units of analyses. Accuracy assessments for both study sites identified the classes that were responsible for most of the map error. In addition, spatially explicit confidence maps supported our understanding of the sources of error. This paper provides a useful methodology to improve accuracy assessment and reporting and is well suited to studies where groundtruth data are limited.
How good is my map? A tool for semi-automated thematic mapping and spatially explicit confidence assessment
P. Mitchell,A. Downie,M. Diesing
Published 2018 in Environmental Modelling & Software
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
Environmental Modelling & Software
- Publication date
2018-10-01
- Fields of study
Geography, Computer Science, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-63 of 63 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-36 of 36 citing papers · Page 1 of 1