Milinski's tit-for-tat hypothesis: do fish preferentially inspect in pairs?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1992

• Venue

  Animal Behaviour

• Publication date

  1992-04-01

• Fields of study

  Biology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81026-7
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The inheritance and development of minnow anti-predator behaviour

  1990cited by this paper
• Tit-for-tat cooperation in sticklebacks: a critique of Milinski

  1990cited by this paper
• No alternative to TIT FOR TAT cooperation in sticklebacks

  1990cited by this paper
• TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation

  1987cited by this paper
• Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator-evasion behaviour in minnow shoals

  1987cited by this paper
• The evolution of cooperation

  1981cited by this paper

• Mouse models of human disease

  2016cites this paper
• Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together

  2006cites this paper
• THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION Four paths to the evolution and maintenance of cooperative behavior

  2004cites this paper
• Predator attack motivation influences the inspection behaviour of European minnows

  1997cites this paper
• The Evolution of Cooperation.

  1997cites this paper
• Chaos, cheating and cooperation: potential solutions to the Prisoner's Dilemma

  1996cites this paper
• Predator Inspection Behaviour Covaries With Schooling Tendency Amongst Wild Guppy, Poecilia Reticulata, Populations in Trinidad

  1994cites this paper
• A method of modelling time dependent data: swimming in guppies (Poecilia Reticulata) under threat of a predator.

  1994cites this paper
• Predator inspection - cooperation or 'safety in numbers'?

  1992cites this paper