Long et al. (BMC Bioinformatics 2014, 15(1):278) describe a “discrepancy” in using UniFrac to assess statistical significance of community differences. Specifically, they find that weighted UniFrac results differ between input trees where (a) replicate sequences each have their own tip, or (b) all replicates are assigned to one tip with an associated count. We argue that these are two distinct cases that differ in the probability distribution on which the statistical test is based, because of the differences in tree topology. Further study is needed to understand which randomization procedure best detects different aspects of community dissimilarities.
The unifrac significance test is sensitive to tree topology
Published 2015 in BMC Bioinformatics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2015
- Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
- Publication date
2015-07-07
- Fields of study
Biology, Medicine, Computer Science, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-17 of 17 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-27 of 27 citing papers · Page 1 of 1