Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking

The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 provides the Proportion top-10% publications (PPtop-10%) as a new indicator. This indicator allows for testing performance differences between two universities for statistical significance.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Scientometrics

• Publication date

  2011-12-17

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Economics, Mathematics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11192-012-0636-6arXiv 1112.4037PMID 22904580PMCID 3416977
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents by using an “Integrated Impact Indicator” (I3)

  2011cited by this paper
• Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing

  2011cited by this paper
• Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents

  2011cited by this paper
• The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011

  2011cited by this paper
• Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures

  2001cited by this paper
• Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures: Third Edition

  2000cited by this paper
• Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 2nd ed.

  2000cited by this paper

• A discussion of measuring the top-1% most-highly cited publications: quality and impact of Chinese papers

  2022cites this paper
• A heuristic approach based on Leiden rankings to identify outliers: evidence from Italian universities in the European landscape

  2022influential citation
• The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor

  2018cites this paper
• 1 I 3 : A Non-Parametric Alternative to the Journal Impact Factor

  2018cites this paper
• Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings

  2017cites this paper
• Assessing the legitimacy of HEIs’ contributions to society: The perspective of international rankings

  2017cites this paper
• University-Industry Collaboration in China and the USA: A Bibliometric Comparison

  2016cites this paper
• A strategic management approach for Korean public research institutes based on bibliometric investigation

  2015cites this paper
• A strategic management approach for Korean public research institutes based on bibliometric investigation

  2014cites this paper
• The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations

  2014cites this paper
• Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration

  2014cites this paper
• Response to ‘How good is research really?’

  2013cites this paper
• The revised SNIP indicator of Elsevier's Scopus

  2013cites this paper
• The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations

  2013cites this paper
• Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs

  2013cites this paper
• Elsevier's Scopus has a revised SNIP indicator for journal ranking

  2013cites this paper
• Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging "big data" research

  2013cites this paper
• Methodology for Comparative Analysis of University Rankings, with the Mediterranean and Black Sea Region Countries Taken as an Example

  2013cites this paper
• The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

  2012cites this paper
• Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models

  2012cites this paper
• Field-normalized Impact Factors: A Comparison of Rescaling versus Fractionally Counted IFs

  2012cites this paper
• Testing University Rankings Statistically : Why this Perhaps is not such a Good Idea after All . Some Reflections on Statistical Power , Effect Size , Random Sampling and Imaginary Populations

  2012cites this paper
• Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers

  2012cites this paper
• Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012)

  2012cites this paper
• An Integrated Impact Indicator (I3): A New Definition of "Impact" with Policy Relevance

  2012cites this paper
• The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits

  2012cites this paper
• Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)

  2011cites this paper