On the duty of the doctor not to disclose athlete doping data without consent

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics

• Publication date

  2011-07-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/19406940.2011.579144
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Ethics of Doping and Anti-Doping: Redeeming the Soul of Sport?

  2011cited by this paper
• Doping and Anti-Doping Policy in Sport : Ethical, Legal and Social Perspectives

  2011cited by this paper
• Confidentiality, disclosure and doping in sports medicine

  2009cited by this paper
• Ethics in sports medicine

  2009cited by this paper
• Beyond Consent? Paternalism and Pediatric Doping

  2009cited by this paper
• Elite sport, doping and public health

  2009cited by this paper
• Contractual obligations and the sharing of confidential health information in sport

  2008cited by this paper
• Globalisation of anti-doping: the reverse side of the medal

  2008cited by this paper
• No Secrets: Guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse

  2008cited by this paper
• Principles of Healthcare Ethics

  2007cited by this paper
• Ethical issues concerning New Zealand sports doctors

  2005cited by this paper
• Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Bombing

  2005cited by this paper
• Doping and public policy

  2004cited by this paper
• General practitioners and doping in sport: attitudes and experience

  2003cited by this paper
• Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice

  2003cited by this paper
• Irrational or insensitive: Is guilt a proper emotional response to the causing of an unintentional injury?

  2002cited by this paper
• The unavoidable heterogeneity of sporting experience and sport philosophy

  2002cited by this paper
• Confidentiality within physiotherapy: perceptions and attitudes of clinical practitioners

  2000cited by this paper
• Ethics in Sports Medicine

  2000cited by this paper
• W v. Egdell.

  1988cited by this paper
• The Work of the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (N.S.P.C.C

  1972cited by this paper

• Anabolic–Androgenic Steroids and Brain Damage: A Review of Evidence and Medico-Legal Implications

  2025cites this paper
• The doping mindset—Part I: Implications of the Functional Use Theory on mental representations of doping

  2013cites this paper