Homophily and Social Norms in Experimental Network Formation Games

Field studies of networks have uncovered a preference to befriend people we perceive as similar according to some dimensions of our identity (“homophily”). Lab studies of network formation games have found that adherence to social norms of reciprocity and inequity aversion are also drivers of network choices. No study so far has attempted to investigate the role of both homophily and social norms in a controlled environment. At the beginning of our experiment, each player fills in a personal profile. Each player then views the profile of all other players and expresses a degree of perceived similarity between his/her profile and the profile of the other player. At this point, a repeated network formation game ensues. We find that: (1) potential homophily considerations triggered by the profile rating task did not measurably change the players’ behavior compared to the baseline; (2) reciprocity plays a significant role in the formulation of the players’ strategies, in particular lowering the probability that the player naively best responds to the network observed in the previous period. We speculate that reciprocation of past choices might be a more “available” aid in strategy-formulation than considerations related to the similarity of the other players.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Games

• Publication date

  2018-10-19

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Computer Science, Economics, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3390/G9040083
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Our Buddies, Ourselves: The Role of Sexual Homophily in Adolescent Friendship Networks.

  2019cited by this paper
• Homophily in delinquent behavior: The rise and fall of friend similarity across adolescence

  2019cited by this paper
• Homophily and Individual Performance

  2018cited by this paper
• An Homophily-based Approach for Fast Post Recommendation on Twitter

  2018cited by this paper
• Social distance and network structures

  2017cited by this paper
• Social groups and social network formation

  2017cited by this paper
• Conditional cooperation in network public goods experiments

  2017cited by this paper
• A holistic approach for personalization, relevance feedback & recommendation in enriched multimedia content

  2016cited by this paper
• Personalized multimedia content retrieval through relevance feedback techniques for enhanced user experience

  2015cited by this paper
• Growing Stars: A Laboratory Analysis of Network Formation

  2015cited by this paper
• Exploiting homophily-based implicit social network to improve recommendation performance

  2014cited by this paper
• The effect of social fragmentation on public good provision : an experimental study

  2014cited by this paper
• Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects?

  2014cited by this paper
• Random-Effects, Fixed-Effects and the within-between Specification for Clustered Data in Observational Health Studies: A Simulation Study

  2014cited by this paper
• Within and between Estimates in Random-Effects Models: Advantages and Drawbacks of Correlated Random Effects and Hybrid Models

  2013cited by this paper
• It's all about Connections: Evidence on Network Formation

  2012influential reference
• Homophily and long-run integration in social networks

  2012cited by this paper
• To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive

  2011cited by this paper
• Network formation in repeated interactions: experimental evidence on dynamic behaviour

  2010cited by this paper
• The 1/d Law of Giving

  2010cited by this paper
• Group Identity and Social Preferences

  2009cited by this paper
• Discrete choice modelling

  2009cited by this paper
• Social identity and trust - An experimental investigation

  2008cited by this paper
• In Search of Stars: Network Formation among Heterogeneous Agents

  2008influential reference
• Relational Goods, Sociability, and Happiness

  2008cited by this paper
• Identity and Why We Cooperate with Those We Do

  2008cited by this paper
• An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities and Segregation

  2007cited by this paper
• Evolution of networks—an experimental analysis

  2007cited by this paper
• American Economic Association Do We Underestimate the Benefits of Cultural Competition ?

  2007cited by this paper
• Social identity strategies in recent economics

  2006cited by this paper
• XTOVERID: Stata module to calculate tests of overidentifying restrictions after xtreg, xtivreg, xtivreg2, xthtaylor

  2006cited by this paper
• Microeconometrics: Maximum Likelihood and Nonlinear Least-Squares Estimation

  2005cited by this paper
• The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms

  2005cited by this paper
• Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms

  2002cited by this paper
• Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks

  2001cited by this paper
• Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity

  2001cited by this paper
• A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation

  2000influential reference
• On the evolutionary stability of preferences for reciprocity

  2000cited by this paper
• Economics and Identity

  2000cited by this paper
• A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation

  1998cited by this paper
• On the testing of correlated effects with panel data

  1993cited by this paper
• On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data

  1978cited by this paper
• Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability

  1973cited by this paper
• Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis

  1964cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.