The scaling equation, Y1 = Y2, has been used empirically and explored theoretically primarily to determine the numerical value and meaning of the scaling exponent, . The mathematical interpretation of is clear –– it is the quotient of the relative rate of change of Y1 with respect to the rate of change of Y2. In contrast, the interpretation of the normalization constant, , is obscure, so much so that some workers have rejected the idea that it has any biological importance. With the notable exception of Steven J. Gould’s early work, Huxley’s dismissal of largely relegated the study of its biological role to that of an academic afterthought. Here, we attempt to clarify the meaning of by using examples from plant biology to illustrate the four primary difficulties that have obscured its importance: (1) the consistency of the units and the metrics of measurement (e.g., meters and body length, respectively), (2) the relationship between and , (3) the interpretation of scaling equations, and (4) detecting if the numerical value of has changed and if the change is biologically meaningful. Using examples, we show that is biologically interpretable and offers a way to quantitatively consider similarities of biological form if (1) it is expressed in terms of the relative magnitudes of Y1 or Y2 for corresponding data points in a set of Y1 = Y2 equations, (2) the units of measurements are in the same scale, and (3) the corresponding dimensionless numbers are established based on the same units of measurement. We provide examples of where the numerical value of or differences in the values of are important, and we propose a research agenda examining the meaning of values in terms of trait-based ecology.
On the Interpretation of the Normalization Constant in the Scaling Equation
Published 2019 in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Publication date
2019-01-11
- Fields of study
Mathematics
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-49 of 49 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-29 of 29 citing papers · Page 1 of 1