Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Quality of Life Research

• Publication date

  2014-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11136-013-0451-4PMID 23877585PMCID PMC3910422
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Peak and end effects in patients' daily recall of pain and fatigue: a within-subjects analysis.

  2011cited by this paper
• The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

  2010cited by this paper
• Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods

  2010cited by this paper
• Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

  2009cited by this paper
• Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet

  2009cited by this paper
• Effects of mode and order of administration on generic health-related quality of life scores.

  2009cited by this paper
• The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods

  2008cited by this paper
• Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.

  2008cited by this paper
• Feasibility, reliability, and validity of adolescent health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire Child Form (CHQ-CF): internet administration compared with the standard paper version

  2007cited by this paper
• The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years

  2007cited by this paper
• Comparison of Internet-Based and Paper-Based Questionnaires in Taiwan Using Multisample Invariance Approach

  2007cited by this paper
• Mode of Administration Is Important in US National Estimates of Health-Related Quality of Life

  2007cited by this paper
• Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

  2007cited by this paper
• Assessing the onset of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction using interactive voice response technology.

  2007cited by this paper
• An evaluation of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology and the hamilton rating scale for depression: a sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report.

  2006cited by this paper
• Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys.

  2005cited by this paper
• Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

  2005cited by this paper
• Measuring Stroke Impact With the Stroke Impact Scale: Telephone Versus Mail Administration in Veterans With Stroke

  2005cited by this paper
• Comparison of Mail and Telephone in Assessing Patient Experiences in Receiving Care from Medical Group Practices

  2005cited by this paper
• Differences in mail and telephone responses to self‐rated health: use of multiple imputation in correcting for response bias

  2005cited by this paper
• An NCME Instructional Module on Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development.

  2005cited by this paper
• Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices

  2004cited by this paper
• Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking

  2004cited by this paper
• Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.

  2004cited by this paper
• SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide

  2003cited by this paper
• Measuring alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems: comparison of responses from self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews.

  2001cited by this paper
• Comparison of interactive voice response and written self-administered patient surveys for clinical research.

  2001cited by this paper
• Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory

  1997cited by this paper
• Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

  1995cited by this paper
• Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National Survey

  1994cited by this paper
• SF-36 Health Survey.

  1990cited by this paper
• Printed in Great Britain

  1970cited by this paper

• Perinatal Cannabis Use, Depression, and the Mother-Child Dyad: Protocol for a Prospective Multimethod Study

  2025cites this paper
• A Qualitative Study of Ecological Momentary Assessment of Suicide Risk for Persons Living With HIV in Philadelphia, PA, USA: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Ethical Implications.

  2025cites this paper
• Does the Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments Improve the Sensitivity of PROMIS Upper Extremity Scores Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

  2024cites this paper
• Examining the proximal relationship between religious coping and depression among trauma-exposed adults

  2024cites this paper
• Brief Video-Delivered Intervention to Reduce Anxiety and Improve Functioning in Older Veterans: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

  2024cites this paper
• The use of PROMIS measures in clinical studies in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review

  2023cites this paper
• Development of the Orthodontic Treatment Impact Questionnaire: Cross-sectional validation.

  2022cites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  2021cites this paper
• Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions

  2021cites this paper
• Choosing and Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice.

  2021cites this paper
• Adherence of Mobile App-Based Surveys and Comparison With Traditional Surveys: eCohort Study

  2021cites this paper
• Score equivalence of paper-, tablet-, and interactive voice response system-based versions of PROMIS, PRO-CTCAE, and numerical rating scales among cancer patients

  2021cites this paper
• Measuring social desirability bias: Do the full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale matter?

  2021cites this paper
• Adherence of Mobile App-Based Surveys and Comparison With Traditional Surveys: eCohort Study (Preprint)

  2020cites this paper
• Guided self-management targeting anxiety and activity participation in older Veterans

  2020cites this paper
• Negligible Effects of the Survey Modes for Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

  2020cites this paper
• Considerations to Support Use of PROMIS Pediatric Measures in Ambulatory Clinics.

  2020cites this paper
• Developing Measures of Pain Appraisal and Pain-Related Self-Efficacy for People Living with Chronic Pain

  2019cites this paper
• Feasibility and acceptability of using an IVRS to assess decision making about sun protection

  2019cites this paper
• Taking the patient and the patient's perspective into account to improve outcomes of care of patients with musculoskeletal diseases.

  2019cites this paper
• Hypertension specific patient-reported outcome measure. Part II: validation survey and item selection process

  2019cites this paper
• Are Geriatric Patients Who Sustain High-Energy Traumatic Injury Likely to Return to Functional Independence?

  2019cites this paper
• Response styles confound the age gradient of four health and well-being outcomes.

  2019cites this paper
• Applying PRO Reference Values to Communicate Clinically Relevant Information at the Point-of-care.

  2019cites this paper
• Interviewer- Versus Self-Administration of PROMIS® Measures for Adults With Traumatic Injury

  2019cites this paper
• Effect of Stroke Education Pamphlets vs a 12-Minute Culturally Tailored Stroke Film on Stroke Preparedness Among Black and Hispanic Churchgoers: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

  2019cites this paper
• Development of the TBI-QOL Headache Pain Item Bank and Short Form

  2019cites this paper
• Pilot Study of Dose–Response Effects of Exercise on Change in C-Reactive Protein, Cortisol, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Cancer Survivors

  2018cites this paper
• A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration

  2018cites this paper
• Psychometric Evaluation of PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures in a Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

  2018cites this paper
• Depressed mood during the menopausal transition: is it reproductive aging or is it life?

  2017cites this paper
• Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis

  2017cites this paper
• Evaluating measurement invariance across assessment modes of phone interview and computer self-administered survey for the PROMIS measures in a population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer survivors

  2017cites this paper
• Language‐related differential item functioning between English and German PROMIS Depression items is negligible

  2017cites this paper
• Association between morning symptoms and physical activity in COPD: a systematic review

  2017cites this paper
• Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics

  2017cites this paper
• Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions

  2017cites this paper
• An Overview of the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Assessing Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

  2017cites this paper
• Raising the profile of pilot and feasibility studies in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures

  2017cites this paper
• Psychometric Properties and Performance of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Depression Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.

  2016cites this paper
• Applying Rasch analysis to evaluate measurement equivalence of different administration formats of the Activity Limitation scale of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR)

  2016cites this paper
• Depression symptoms across cultures: an IRT analysis of standard depression symptoms using data from eight countries

  2016cites this paper
• Hand-related physical function in rheumatic hand conditions: a protocol for developing a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument

  2016cites this paper
• PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity.

  2016cites this paper
• Mode effects between computer self-administration and telephone interviewer-administration of the PROMIS® pediatric measures, self- and proxy report

  2016cites this paper
• Ecological momentary assessment versus standard assessment instruments for measuring mindfulness, depressed mood, and anxiety among older adults.

  2016cites this paper
• Measurement Properties of PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Forms in a Large, Ethnically Diverse Cancer Cohort

  2016cites this paper
• Methodology of Developing Items of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory

  2016cites this paper
• PROMIS® tools as endpoints in clinical trials: what should you know? A review of PROMIS® capabilities and the current regulatory space

  2016cites this paper
• Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions.

  2016cites this paper
• Interpretability of the PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales and Gastrointestinal Worry Scales in Pediatric Patients With Functional and Organic Gastrointestinal Diseases.

  2015cites this paper
• Reliability and construct validity of PROMIS® measures for patients with heart failure who undergo heart transplant

  2015cites this paper
• Assessment of an interactive voice response system for identifying falls in a statewide sample of older adults.

  2015cites this paper
• Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013

  2015cites this paper
• SOCIALLY DESIRABLE

  2015cites this paper
• Patient-reported outcome assessment after total joint replacement: comparison of questionnaire completion times on paper and tablet computer

  2015cites this paper
• Time to change

  2015cites this paper
• Testing item response theory invariance of the standardized Quality-of-life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS®) in acute coronary syndrome patients: differential functioning of items and test

  2015cites this paper
• Longitudinal Evaluation of PROMIS-29 and FACIT-Dyspnea Short Forms in Systemic Sclerosis

  2015cites this paper
• Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.

  2015cites this paper
• Family care map: Sustaining family-centered care in Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers.

  2014cites this paper
• PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales and Gastrointestinal Worry Scales in pediatric patients with functional and organic gastrointestinal diseases in comparison to healthy controls

  2014cites this paper
• Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): efficient, standardized tools to measure self-reported health and quality of life.

  2014cites this paper
• Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity.

  2014influential citation
• New Technologies in COPD Management

  2014cites this paper
• Strategies Addressing Quality of Life: Management of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Symptoms

  2014cites this paper
• Psychometric Evaluation of Joint-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Before and After Total Knee Replacement: A Dissertation

  2014cites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper
• a means of measuring the impact of illness, and its associated treatments, or other types of intervention, from the patient’s perspective.

  year unknowncites this paper