Use of multi-state models to explore relationships between changes in body condition, habitat and survival of grizzly bears Ursus arctos horribilis

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2013-10-18

• Fields of study

  Biology, Geography, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.2981/12-088
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education

  2016cited by this paper
• Optimal Foraging, Predation Risk and Territory Defence

  2015cited by this paper
• R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

  2014cited by this paper
• Simple Estimation and Test Procedures in Capture–Mark–Recapture Mixed Models

  2012cited by this paper
• Maternal condition determines birth date and growth of newborn bear cubs

  2012cited by this paper
• Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears

  2012cited by this paper
• Developing a population target for an overabundant ungulate for ecosystem restoration

  2011cited by this paper
• Invading White-Tailed Deer Change Wolf-Caribou Dynamics in Northeastern Alberta

  2011cited by this paper
• Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research

  2011cited by this paper
• Dynamic wildlife habitat models: Seasonal foods and mortality risk predict occupancy-abundance and habitat selection in grizzly bears

  2010cited by this paper
• Spatial and temporal use of roads by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta

  2010cited by this paper
• Hair cortisol concentration as a noninvasive measure of long-term stress in free-ranging grizzly bears (Ursus arctos): considerations with implications for other wildlife

  2010cited by this paper
• Multistate capture–recapture analysis under imperfect state observation: an application to disease models

  2009cited by this paper
• U‐CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data

  2009influential reference
• Remote sensing and forest inventory for wildlife habitat assessment

  2009cited by this paper
• Estimating reproductive rates for female bears: Proportions versus transition probabilities

  2008cited by this paper
• Can natural disturbance-based forestry rescue a declining population of grizzly bears?

  2008cited by this paper
• An Evaluation of Long-term Capture Effects in Ursids: Implications for Wildlife Welfare and Research

  2008cited by this paper
• Anesthesia of grizzly bears using xylazine-zolazepam-tiletamine or zolazepam-tiletamine

  2007cited by this paper
• A META-ANALYSIS OF GRIZZLY BEAR DNA MARK-RECAPTURE PROJECTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , CANADA INVITED

  2007cited by this paper
• Concerns regarding a call for pluralism of information theory and hypothesis testing

  2007cited by this paper
• Multistate Survival Models and Their Extensions in Program MARK

  2006cited by this paper
• An empirical test of DNA mark–recapture sampling strategies for grizzly bears

  2006cited by this paper
• A habitat-based framework for grizzly bear conservation in Alberta

  2006cited by this paper
• Principles and interest of GOF tests for multistate capture-recapture models

  2005cited by this paper
• Remote sensing for large-area habitat mapping

  2005cited by this paper
• Consumption of salmon by Alaskan brown bears: a trade-off between nutritional requirements and the risk of infanticide?

  2004cited by this paper
• Modelling the spatial distribution of human-caused grizzly bear mortalities in the Central Rockies ecosystem of Canada

  2004cited by this paper
• Grizzly bears and forestry I: Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada

  2004cited by this paper
• Dealing with death data: individual hazards, mortality and bias

  2003cited by this paper
• PHYSIOLOGIC RESPONSES OF GRIZZLY BEARS TO DIFFERENT METHODS OF CAPTURE

  2003cited by this paper
• Analysis and Management of Animal Populations

  2002cited by this paper
• Analysis of Messy Data Volume III: Analysis of Covariance

  2002cited by this paper
• A body-condition index for ursids

  2002cited by this paper
• JOINT ANALYSIS OF LIVE AND DEAD ENCOUNTERS OF MARKED ANIMALS

  2002cited by this paper
• Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously

  2002cited by this paper
• Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals

  1999cited by this paper
• Genetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears

  1999cited by this paper
• Rates and Causes of Grizzly Bear Mortality in the Interior Mountains of British Columbia, Alberta, Montana, Washington, and Idaho

  1999cited by this paper
• Violin plots : A box plot-density trace synergism

  1998cited by this paper
• Integrating people and wildlife for a sustainable future

  1995cited by this paper
• The use of multi-state capture-recapture models to address questions in evolutionary ecology

  1995cited by this paper
• Global Optimization of Statistical Functions with Simulated Annealing

  1994cited by this paper
• Estimating breeding proportions and testing hypotheses about costs of reproduction with capture-recapture data

  1994cited by this paper
• CAPTURE-RECAPTURE STUDIES FOR MULTIPLE STRATA INCLUDING NON-MARKOVIAN TRANSITIONS

  1993cited by this paper
• ESTIMATES OF MOVEMENT AND SITE FIDELITY USING MARK-RESIGHT DATA OF WINTERING CANADA GEESE'

  1991cited by this paper
• Factors affecting black bear reproductive success and cub survival

  1989cited by this paper
• Responses of Grizzly Bears to Logging Truck Traffic in the Kimsquit River Valley, British Columbia

  1987cited by this paper

• Estimating body condition of Apennine brown bears using subjective scoring based on camera trap photographs

  2024cites this paper
• Brown bear occurrence along a proposed highway route in Romania’s Carpathian Mountains

  2024cites this paper
• Grizzly bear behavior in south-central Alaska: Use of a hidden Markov model to assess behavior

  2024cites this paper
• The conversion of native savannah into pasturelands does not affect exclusively species diversity: Effects on physiological condition of a highly abundant dung beetle species

  2023cites this paper
• Joint estimation of survival and dispersal effectively corrects the permanent emigration bias in mark-recapture analyses

  2023cites this paper
• Understanding Species–Habitat Associations: A Case Study with the World’s Bears

  2022cites this paper
• Genetic status and conservation implications of endangered Formosan black bears

  2022cites this paper
• Characterizing Off-Highway Road Use with Remote-Sensing, Social Media and Crowd-Sourced Data: An Application to Grizzly Bear (Ursus Arctos) Habitat

  2021cites this paper
• Feasibility of Using Small UAVs to Derive Morphometric Measurements of Australian Snubfin (Orcaella heinsohni) and Humpback (Sousa sahulensis) Dolphins

  2021cites this paper
• Survival of the fattest: linking body condition to prey availability and survivorship of killer whales

  2021cites this paper
• Response of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) to pipelines in Alberta

  2021cites this paper
• Long-term survival probability, not current habitat quality, predicts dispersal distance in a stream salamander.

  2020cites this paper
• Effects of roads and motorized human access on grizzly bear populations in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada

  2020influential citation
• Large carnivores living alongside humans: Brown bears in human-modified landscapes

  2020cites this paper
• Response of a remnant marmot population to habitat enhancement yields insights into marmot ecology

  2020cites this paper
• Variations in grizzly bear habitat selection in relation to the daily and seasonal availability of annual plant-food resources

  2020cites this paper
• Steep and deep: Terrain and climate factors explain brown bear (Ursus arctos) alpine den site selection to guide heli-skiing management

  2020cites this paper
• Population‐level monitoring of stress in grizzly bears between 2004 and 2014

  2020cites this paper
• Do remnant retention patches and forest edges increase grizzly bear food supply?

  2019cites this paper
• Mark-Recapture Models for Estimation of Demographic Parameters

  2019cites this paper
• CAUSES OF VARIATION IN DISPERSAL DISTANCE IN THE STREAM SALAMANDER GYRINOPHILUS PORPHYRITICUS

  2019cites this paper
• Grizzly bear selection of recently harvested forests is dependent on forest recovery rate and landscape composition

  2019cites this paper
• Factors associated with black bear density and implications for management

  2019cites this paper
• Can concentrations of steroid hormones in brown bear hair reveal age class?

  2018cites this paper
• A multi-scale assessment of spatial-temporal change in the movement ecology and habitat of a threatened Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) population in Alberta, Canada

  2018cites this paper
• Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta

  2018cites this paper
• Linking intraspecific trait variation to community abundance dynamics improves ecological predictability by revealing a growth–defence trade‐off

  2018cites this paper
• Complementary food resources of carnivory and frugivory affect local abundance of an omnivorous carnivore

  2017cites this paper
• REVIEW: Can habitat selection predict abundance?

  2016cites this paper
• Predicting spatial variation in grizzly bear abundance to inform conservation

  2016cites this paper
• SPECIAL FEATURE REVIEW: STUCK IN MOTION? RECONNECTING QUESTIONS AND TOOLS IN MOVEMENT ECOLOGY Can habitat selection predict abundance?

  2015cites this paper
• Assessing Nutritional Parameters of Brown Bear Diets among Ecosystems Gives Insight into Differences among Populations

  2015cites this paper
• A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models

  2015cites this paper
• A time geographic approach for delineating areas of sustained wildlife use

  2015cites this paper
• The Impact of Roads on the Demography of Grizzly Bears in Alberta

  2014cites this paper
• Environmental factors and habitat use influence body condition of individuals in a species at risk, the grizzly bear

  2014influential citation