Correction to: Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that the authors’ last names have been incorrectly tagged as first names and vice-versa. The original publication has been corrected.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  BMC Cancer

• Publication date

  2018-12-27

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-5296-yPMID 30732574PMCID 6366108
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?

  2018cited by this paper
• Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

  2018cited by this paper
• Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.

  2017cited by this paper
• Correlation between postoperative prostate-specific antigen and biochemical recurrence in positive surgical margin patients: Single surgeon series

  2017cited by this paper
• Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  2017cited by this paper
• The number of primary events per variable affects estimation of the subdistribution hazard competing risks model.

  2017cited by this paper
• Implementation of a Surgeon‐Level Comparative Quality Performance Review to Improve Positive Surgical Margin Rates during Radical Prostatectomy

  2017cited by this paper
• Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

  2017cited by this paper
• The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer

  2016cited by this paper
• Are you now a good surgeon? T2 positive margin status as a quality outcome measure following radical prostatectomy

  2016cited by this paper
• Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus

  2016cited by this paper
• Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.

  2015cited by this paper
• The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow‐up of 5 years

  2015cited by this paper
• Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients

  2015cited by this paper
• Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?

  2015cited by this paper
• Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Ten years of follow-up

  2014cited by this paper
• Impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy.

  2014cited by this paper
• Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.

  2014cited by this paper
• Location, extent, and multifocality of positive surgical margins for biochemical recurrence prediction after radical prostatectomy

  2014cited by this paper
• Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality.

  2014cited by this paper
• Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience

  2014cited by this paper
• Radical prostatectomy: positive surgical margins matter.

  2013cited by this paper
• Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin‐associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer

  2013cited by this paper
• Surgical margin status of specimen and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 400 procedures

  2012cited by this paper
• Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study.

  2011cited by this paper
• Mid-term biochemical recurrence-free outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

  2011cited by this paper
• Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients.

  2011cited by this paper
• Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy

  2011cited by this paper
• A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy.

  2010cited by this paper
• The length of positive surgical margins correlates with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

  2010cited by this paper
• Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

  2009cited by this paper
• Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume

  2001cited by this paper

• A multi-surgeon learning curve analysis of overall and site-specific positive surgical margins after RARP and implications for training

  2021cites this paper
• Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

  2020cites this paper