To explain the origins of new scientific ideas, historians and philosophers of science point to examples where scientists appear to have drawn analogies between their scientific domain and some very different domain. By contrast, research from the psychology lab suggests that those kinds of analogies are very difficult to obtain in even the simplest situations. To resolve this potential conflict, we examine the analogies that occur in psychology lab group and formal colloquium settings. This approach can be viewed as a crosssectional approximation of an historical analysis. We find that as the setting moves further away from the original discovery, the way different types of analogies appear to be used changes. In particular, analogies between very different domains are never used in reasoning in the lab group, whereas they are frequently used in reasoning in formal colloquium presentations. Yet, we find that analogy between very similar domains remains an important source of new ideas and a method for solving problems in scientific settings.
Analogies Out of the Blue: When History Seems to Retell Itself
Lelyn D. Saner,Christian D. Schunn
Published 2020 in Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
- Publication date
2020-12-22
- Fields of study
History, Computer Science, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-21 of 21 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-2 of 2 citing papers · Page 1 of 1