Risk characterization is perhaps the most important part of risk assessment. As currently practiced, risk characterizations do not convey the degree of uncertainty in a risk estimate to risk managers, Congress, the press, and the public. Here, we use a framework put forth by an ad hoc study group of industry and government scientists and academics to critique the risk characterizations contained in two risks assessments of gasoline vapor. After discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each assessment's risk characterization, we detail an alternative approach that conveys estimates in the form of a probability distribution. The distributional approach can make use of all relevant scientific data and knowledge, including alternative data sets and all plausible mechanistic theories of carcinogenesis. As a result, this approach facilitates better public health decisions than current risk characterization procedures. We discuss methodological issues, as well as strengths and weaknesses of the distributional approach.
The challenge of risk characterization: current practice and future directions.
George M. Gray,Joshua T. Cohen,John D. Graham
Published 1993 in Environmental Health Perspectives
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
1993
- Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publication date
1993-12-01
- Fields of study
Political Science, Medicine, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-16 of 16 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-5 of 5 citing papers · Page 1 of 1