We revisit the problem of designing optimal, individually rational matching mechanisms (in a general sense, allowing for cycles in directed graphs), where each player --- who is associated with a subset of vertices --- matches as many of his own vertices when he opts into the matching mechanism as when he opts out. We offer a new perspective on this problem by considering an arbitrary graph, but assuming that vertices are associated with players at random. Our main result asserts that, under certain conditions, any fixed optimal matching is likely to be individually rational up to lower-order terms. We also show that a simple and practical mechanism is (fully) individually rational, and likely to be optimal up to lower-order terms. We discuss the implications of our results for market design in general, and kidney exchange in particular.
Opting Into Optimal Matchings
Avrim Blum,I. Caragiannis,Nika Haghtalab,Ariel D. Procaccia,Eviatar B. Procaccia,Rohit Vaish
Published 2016 in ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2016
- Venue
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
- Publication date
2016-09-13
- Fields of study
Mathematics, Computer Science, Economics
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-32 of 32 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-21 of 21 citing papers · Page 1 of 1