Estimates of the Average Strength of Natural Selection Are Not Inflated by Sampling Error or Publication Bias

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  American Naturalist

• Publication date

  2007-08-17

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1086/521239PMID 17891729
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The evolution of the phenotypic covariance matrix: evidence for selection and drift in Melanoplus

  2005cited by this paper
• Sexual Selection Can Resolve Sex-Linked Sexual Antagonism

  2005cited by this paper
• Evolutionary biology: The power of natural selection

  2005cited by this paper
• POWER AND POTENTIAL BIAS IN FIELD STUDIES OF NATURAL SELECTION

  2004cited by this paper
• COMPARING STRENGTHS OF DIRECTIONAL SELECTION: HOW STRONG IS STRONG?

  2004cited by this paper
• The power of natural selection

  2002cited by this paper
• Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild

  2001influential reference
• How strong is natural selection?

  2001influential reference
• The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations

  2001influential reference
• Natural selection in the wild.

  2000cited by this paper
• QUASIREPLICATION AND THE CONTRACT OF ERROR: Lessons from Sex Ratios, Heritabilities and Fluctuating Asymmetry

  2000influential reference
• Selection on Fledging Mass in the Collared Flycatcher and the Great Tit

  1992cited by this paper
• MEASURING SELECTION ON A POPULATION OF DAMSELFLIES WITH A MANIPULATED PHENOTYPE

  1991cited by this paper
• THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE TO HERBIVORY IN IPOMOEA PURPUREA. I. ATTEMPTS TO DETECT SELECTION

  1989cited by this paper
• THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS

  1983cited by this paper

• Most published selection gradients are underestimated: Why this is and how to fix it

  2021cites this paper
• Meta‐analysis of magnitudes, differences and variation in evolutionary parameters

  2016cites this paper
• The measurement of selection when detection is imperfect: How good are naïve methods?

  2016cites this paper
• SOLVING THE PARADOX OF STASIS: SQUASHED STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE LIMITS OF DETECTION

  2014cites this paper
• Interspecific patterns of phenotypic selection do not predict intraspecific patterns

  2014influential citation
• Validating Back-Calculation Models Using Population Data

  2013cites this paper
• 12. Software for Statistical Meta-analysis

  2013cites this paper
• 13. Recovering Missing or Partial Data from Studies: A Survey of Conversions and Imputations for Meta-analysis

  2013cites this paper
• 5. Extraction and Critical Appraisal of Data

  2013cites this paper
• 22. Power Statistics for Meta-analysis: Tests for Mean Effects and Homogeneity

  2013cites this paper
• The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection.

  2013cites this paper
• 21. Graphical Presentation of Results

  2013cites this paper
• SYNTHES IS The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection

  2013cites this paper
• Evaluating the Effects of Electricity on Fish Embryos as a Potential Strategy for Controlling Invasive Cyprinids

  2013cites this paper
• Estimating fluctuating selection in age‐structured populations

  2012cites this paper
• Measuring rates of phenotypic evolution and the inseparability of tempo and mode

  2012cites this paper
• Pollinators exert natural selection on flower size and floral display in Penstemon digitalis.

  2010cites this paper
• The fitness costs of developmental canalization and plasticity

  2009cites this paper
• It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild.

  2009cites this paper
• Implications of a long-term, pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits in a generalist herb.

  2009cites this paper
• Asymmetry of Genetic Variation in Fitness-Related Traits: Apparent Stabilizing Selection on gmax

  2009cites this paper
• Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in a Sexual Selection Mosaic

  2008cites this paper
• Estimating Nonlinear Selection Gradients Using Quadratic Regression Coefficients: Double Or Nothing?

  2008cites this paper
• Genetic basis of fitness differences in natural populations

  2008cites this paper
• Patterns and Power of Phenotypic Selection in Nature

  2007cites this paper