Standards for Experimental Research: Encouraging a Better Understanding of Experimental Methods

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Journal of Experimental Political Science

• Publication date

  2015-12-01

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/XPS.2015.4
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Political Science The State Of The Discipline

  2016cited by this paper
• Reporting Guidelines for Experimental Research: A Report from the Experimental Research Section Standards Committee

  2014cited by this paper
• Publication Bias in the Social Sciences

  2014influential reference
• Hypotheses, Operationalizations, and Manipulation Checks

  2014cited by this paper
• Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys

  2014cited by this paper
• Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process

  2014cited by this paper
• Learning from (failed) replications: Cognitive load manipulations and charitable giving

  2014cited by this paper
• Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer

  2014cited by this paper
• Is Money in Politics Harming Trust in Government? Evidence from Two Survey Experiments

  2013cited by this paper
• Racial Fluidity and Inequality in the United States1

  2012cited by this paper
• Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments

  2012influential reference
• Bridging Partisan Divisions over Antiterrorism Policies

  2012cited by this paper
• The Perils of Randomization Checks in the Analysis of Experiments

  2012cited by this paper
• Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments

  2012cited by this paper
• CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

  2012cited by this paper
• Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials

  2011cited by this paper
• Statistics in medicine.

  2011cited by this paper
• Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators

  2011cited by this paper
• Informed Consent: Roll-Call Knowledge, the Mass Media, and Political Representation

  2011cited by this paper
• CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials

  2010cited by this paper
• Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts

  2010cited by this paper
• Experimenting in Democracy Promotion: International Observers and the 2004 Presidential Elections in Indonesia

  2010cited by this paper
• The Neglected Power of Elite Opinion Leadership to Produce Antipathy Toward the News Media: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

  2010cited by this paper
• Improving Media Effects Research through Better Measurement of News Exposure

  2009cited by this paper
• Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign

  2009cited by this paper
• Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference

  2008cited by this paper
• Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences

  2008cited by this paper
• Laboratory experiments in the social sciences

  2007cited by this paper
• Through a Glass and Darkly: Attitudes Toward International Trade and the Curious Effects of Issue Framing

  2006cited by this paper
• The Indirect Effects of Discredited Stereotypes in Judgments of Jewish Leaders

  2005cited by this paper
• Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  2005cited by this paper
• The SAGE andbook of methods in social psychology

  2004cited by this paper
• The Compassion Strategy Race and the Gender Gap in Campaign 2000

  2004cited by this paper
• Doing Rawls Justice: An Experimental Study of Income Distribution Norms

  2003cited by this paper
• The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality By Tali Mendelberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 320p. $52.50 cloth, $17.95 paper.

  2002cited by this paper
• Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes During Campaigns

  2002cited by this paper
• Statistics As Principled Argument

  1995cited by this paper
• Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.

  1994cited by this paper
• Testing for imbalance of covariates in controlled experiments.

  1990cited by this paper
• Human factors in management information systems

  1988cited by this paper
• Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments

  1986cited by this paper
• Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion

  1982cited by this paper
• Methods in behavioral research

  1977cited by this paper
• Grass roots politics

  1962cited by this paper
• The Social Sciences

  1952cited by this paper
• The Design of Experiments

  1936cited by this paper

• Mitigating the NIMBY effect on renewable energy: Experimental evidence from survey-based interventions in Catalonia

  2025cites this paper
• From fear to support? The role of benefit guarantees in EU multilevel welfare governance

  2025cites this paper
• Relative convenience, relative advantage, perceived security, perceived privacy, and continuous use intention of China's WeChat Pay: A mixed-method two-phase design study

  2025cites this paper
• Unboxing Manipulation Checks for Voice UX

  2025cites this paper
• Reference dependence, expectations and anchoring in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism

  2024cites this paper
• Partisan solutions for partisan problems: electoral threat and Republicans’ openness to the COVID-19 vaccine

  2024cites this paper
• Testing the effectiveness of lottery incentives in online experiments

  2024cites this paper
• Policy preferences in response to large forced migration inflows

  2024cites this paper
• Agents of Change? Women Candidates and Support for Campaign Finance Reform

  2024cites this paper
• Mass Attitudes about International Trade Agreements: Positive Messages and the Trans-Pacific Partnership

  2024cites this paper
• Less Human Than Human: Threat, Language, and Relative Dehumanization

  2023cites this paper
• Voter Information Search and Ranked Choice Voting

  2023cites this paper
• A Practical Guide to Dealing with Attrition in Political Science Experiments

  2023cites this paper
• MORE THAN MEETS THE ITT: A GUIDE FOR INVESTIGATING NULL RESULTS

  2023cites this paper
• Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity Tradeoffs in Public Programs: A Citizen Experiment

  2023cites this paper
• Factual information on the environmental impacts of consumption abroad increases citizens' problem awareness, but not support for mitigating such impacts

  2023cites this paper
• From Believing to Sharing: Examining the Effects of Partisan Media’s Correction of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation

  2022cites this paper
• Liberté, Égalité, Crédibilité: An experimental study of citizens' perceptions of government responses to COVID‐19 in eight countries

  2022cites this paper
• How Dropping Subjects Who Failed Manipulation Checks Can Bias Your Results: An Illustrative Case

  2022cites this paper
• Does Electing Women Reduce Corruption? A Regression Discontinuity Approach

  2022cites this paper
• Game form recognition in preference elicitation, cognitive abilities, and cognitive load

  2022cites this paper
• How promise breaking in trade rhetoric shapes attitudes toward bilateral US-China trade cooperation

  2022cites this paper
• The Advent of Survey Experiments in Politics and International Relations

  2022cites this paper
• Paradigm Repair and News Engagement: Exploring Bari Weiss’s Resignation from the New York Times

  2022cites this paper
• Pass the buck or the buck stops here? The public costs of claiming and deflecting blame in managing crises

  2021cites this paper
• Signaling News Outlet Credibility in a Google Search

  2021cites this paper
• Are people better employees than machines? Dehumanizing language and employee performance appraisals

  2021cites this paper
• Threat-Inducing Violent Events Exacerbate Social Desirability Bias in Survey Responses

  2021cites this paper
• Experts and Questions: Exploring Perceptions of Corruption

  2021cites this paper
• CHAPTER 1 A New Era of Experimental Political Science ∗

  2021cites this paper
• From the lab to the poll: The use of survey experiments in political research

  2021cites this paper
• Do voters prefer more parties on the ballot?

  2021cites this paper
• Studying the Context Effect of Family Norms on Gender Role Attitudes: an Experimental Design

  2021cites this paper
• No magic bullet: estimating anti-immigrant sentiment and social desirability bias with the item-count technique

  2021cites this paper
• A New Era of Experimental Political Science

  2021cites this paper
• Experimente und experimentelle Forschungsdesigns

  2020cites this paper
• The Use of Dress in Objectification Research

  2020cites this paper
• Risk reduction in compulsory disaster insurance: Experimental evidence on moral hazard and financial incentives

  2020cites this paper
• Test-Taking Motivation in Education Students: Task Battery Order Affected Within-Test-Taker Effort and Importance

  2020cites this paper
• Relative convenience, relative advantage, perceived security, perceived privacy, and continuous use intention of China’s WeChat Pay: A mixed-method two-phase design study

  2020cites this paper
• Bringing people closer to the elites: the effect of information on populist attitudes

  2020cites this paper
• When Does Accommodation Work? Electoral Effects of Mainstream Left Position Taking on Immigration

  2020cites this paper
• Framing middle power foreign policy: trade, security, and human rights frames in Canadian and Australian foreign policy attitudes

  2020cites this paper
• Public and elite opinion on international human rights law: Completing the causal chain of the domestic compliance mechanism

  2019cites this paper
• Pass the Buck or the Buck Stops Here ? The Effectiveness of Claiming and Deflecting Blame during Public Management of Crises ∗

  2019cites this paper
• REPUTATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM THE US AND SOUTH KOREA

  2019cites this paper
• Of promoting networking and protecting privacy: Effects of defaults and regulatory focus on social media users' preference settings

  2019cites this paper
• Examining digital video advertising (DVA) effectiveness

  2019cites this paper
• Evidence-based policy and food consumer behaviour: how empirical challenges shape the evidence

  2019cites this paper
• Economic crisis and national attitudes: experimental evidence from Spain

  2019cites this paper
• Testing Complex Social Theories With Causal Mediation Analysis and G-Computation: Toward a Better Way to Do Causal Structural Equation Modeling

  2019cites this paper
• Game form recognition in preference elicitation, cognitive abilities and cognitive load

  2019cites this paper
• Analyzing the Complexity of Performance Information Use: Experiments with Stakeholders to Disaggregate Dimensions of Performance, Data Sources, and Data Types

  2018cites this paper
• No Harm in Checking: Using Factual Manipulation Checks to Assess Attentiveness in Experiments

  2018cites this paper
• Question-Order Effects in the Evaluation of Political Institutions in Decentralized Polities

  2018cites this paper
• Making Austerity Popular: The Media and Mass Attitudes toward Fiscal Policy

  2018cites this paper
• Incentives to Pander: How Politicians Use Corporate Welfare for Political Gain

  2018cites this paper
• Violence Exposure and Support for State Use of Force in a Non-Democracy

  2018cites this paper
• In the wake of a terrorist attack, do Americans’ attitudes toward Muslims decline?

  2018cites this paper
• The changing political impact of compassion-evoking pictures: the case of the drowned toddler Alan Kurdi

  2018cites this paper
• Cultivating a Research Tool Kit for Social Work Doctoral Education

  2018cites this paper
• The big, the bad, and the dangerous: public perceptions and terrorism

  2018cites this paper
• The External Validity of College Student Subject Pools in Experimental Research: A Cross-Sample Comparison of Treatment Effect Heterogeneity

  2018cites this paper
• Loss Aversion, Expectations and Anchoring in the BDM Mechanism

  2018cites this paper
• Heterogeneous Presidential Source Cue Effects on Public Opinion: The Case of the Sotomayor Nomination to the Supreme Court

  2017cites this paper
• Do Good Things Come in Small Packages? Bottle Size Effects on Willingness to Pay for Pomegranate Wine and Grape Wine*

  2017cites this paper
• Economic Development, Mobility, and Political Discontent: An Experimental Test of Tocqueville’s Thesis in Pakistan

  2017cites this paper
• When Will People Pay to Pollute? Environmental Taxes, Political Trust and Experimental Evidence from Britain

  2017cites this paper
• Enhancing Social Support Postincarceration: Results From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

  2017cites this paper
• Economic Rationality under Cognitive Load

  2017cites this paper
• Randomization to treatment failure in experimental auctions: The value of data from training rounds

  2017cites this paper
• Attitudes Toward Delegation to Presidential Commissions

  2017cites this paper
• Improving Causal Inference: Recommendations for Covariate Selection and Balance in Propensity Score Methods

  2017cites this paper
• Chains of Love? Global Production, Developing Country Firms and the Diffusion of Labor Standards

  2016cites this paper
• Marketing Vegetables in Elementary School Cafeterias to Increase Uptake

  2016cites this paper
• Do good things come in small packages? Willingness to pay for pomegranate wine and bottle size effects

  2016cites this paper
• Are You a Team Player ? Executives , Coalition Politics , and Partisan Polarization

  2016cites this paper
• Preferences for locally grown products: evidence from a natural field experiment.

  2016cites this paper
• Reporting Balance Tables, Response Rates and Manipulation Checks in Experimental Research: A Reply from the Committee that Prepared the Reporting Guidelines

  2015cites this paper
• To be(tween) or not to be(tween)? Combining between-and within-subjects design characteristics in preference elicitation for organic and local apples

  year unknowncites this paper
• Incentives and Payment Mechanisms in Preference Elicitation

  year unknowncites this paper