Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  European Journal of Human Genetics

• Publication date

  2013-03-13

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Economics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2013.36PMID 23486538PMCID PMC3798841
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking

  2012cited by this paper
• Barriers to integrating personalized medicine into clinical practice: a best–worst scaling choice experiment

  2012cited by this paper
• Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

  2012cited by this paper
• Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.

  2011cited by this paper
• Discrete-Choice-Experimente zur Messung der Zahlungsbereitschaft für Gesundheitsleistungen – ein anwendungsbezogener Literaturreview

  2010cited by this paper
• The EuroGentest Clinical Utility Gene Cards

  2010cited by this paper
• Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best–worst scaling

  2010cited by this paper
• Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests

  2010cited by this paper
• Bayesian and classical estimation of mixed logit: An application to genetic testing.

  2009cited by this paper
• Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.

  2009cited by this paper
• Technology assessment and resource allocation for predictive genetic testing: A study of the perspectives of Canadian genetic health care providers

  2009cited by this paper
• Valuing the benefit of diagnostic testing for genetic causes of idiopathic developmental disability: willingness to pay from families of affected children

  2009cited by this paper
• Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice

  2009cited by this paper
• How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.

  2009cited by this paper
• Clearing up the hazy road from bench to bedside: A framework for integrating the fourth hurdle into translational medicine

  2008cited by this paper
• Resolving Health Care´s Difficult Choices : Survey of Priority Setting in Sweden and an Analysis of Principles and Guidelines on Priorities in Health Care

  2008cited by this paper
• EuroGentest: DNA-Based Testing for Heritable Disorders in Europe

  2008cited by this paper
• Probabilistic models of set-dependent and attribute-level best-worst choice

  2008cited by this paper
• Economic methods for valuing the outcomes of genetic testing: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis

  2008cited by this paper
• On the Testing Load Incurred by Cascade Genetic Carrier Screening for Mendelian Disorders: A Brief Report

  2007cited by this paper
• Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal?

  2007cited by this paper
• Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it.

  2007cited by this paper
• Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?

  2006cited by this paper
• DNA-based Genetic Testing Is Rising Steeply in a National Health Care System with Open Access to Services: A Survey of Genetic Test Use in Germany, 1996–2002

  2005cited by this paper
• Empiricism, ethics and orthodox economic theory: what is the appropriate basis for decision-making in the health sector?

  2005cited by this paper
• Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.

  2002cited by this paper
• Setting Limits Fairly: Can We Learn to Share Medical Resources?

  2002cited by this paper
• Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare

  2002cited by this paper
• Providing Genetic Testing Through the Private Sector: A View From Canada

  2001cited by this paper
• Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications

  2000cited by this paper
• The ethics of accountability in managed care reform.

  1998cited by this paper
• The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models

  1993cited by this paper

• Is best-worst scaling suitable for patient preference elicitation? A nationwide representative comparison with discrete choice experiments among patients with type 2 diabetes in China

  2026cites this paper
• Residents’ Preferences for Inclusive Commercial Health Insurance: A Comparative Study of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best–Worst Scaling in Heilongjiang Province, China

  2025cites this paper
• Discrete Choice Experiment Versus Best–Worst Scaling: An Empirical Comparison in Eliciting Young People’s Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions

  2025influential citation
• An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Patient Preferences in Infertility Treatment in China

  2025cites this paper
• Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework

  2025cites this paper
• Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

  2024cites this paper
• Cleansing Investor’s Conscience: The Effects of Incidental Guilt on Socially Responsible Investment Decisions

  2023cites this paper
• The Perspective of Patients and Health Professionals on the Prioritization of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. The PRIOFER Study

  2023cites this paper
• An Empirical Comparison of Conjoint and Best-Worst Scaling Case III Methods

  2023cites this paper
• A mainstreaming oncogenomics model: improving the identification of Lynch syndrome

  2023cites this paper
• Preferences of older adults for healthcare models designed to improve care coordination: Evidence from Western Switzerland.

  2023cites this paper
• Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment

  2023cites this paper
• What drives Consumers' Trust in Proactive Services: A Best-Worst scaling approach

  2022cites this paper
• Development of a Patient-Centered Preference Tool for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

  2022cites this paper
• Case 2 best-worst scaling: For good or for bad but not for both

  2021cites this paper
• A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing

  2021cites this paper
• Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.

  2021cites this paper
• Provider preferences for resolving uncertainty and avoiding harms in precision medicine: a discrete choice experiment.

  2020cites this paper
• Understanding User Preferences of Digital Privacy Nudges - A Best-Worst Scaling Approach

  2020cites this paper
• Chunking Big Journeys into Smaller Trips: Combining Peer Creation and Gamification to Design a Continuing Education Concept for Energy Consultants

  2020cites this paper
• Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review

  2020cites this paper
• Tertiary hospitals or community clinics? An enquiry into the factors affecting patients' choice for healthcare facilities in urban China

  2020cites this paper
• Finding Out What Matters in Decision-Making Related to Genomics and Personalized Medicine in Pediatric Oncology: Developing Attributes to Include in a Discrete Choice Experiment

  2020cites this paper
• An R package and tutorial for case 2 best–worst scaling

  2019cites this paper
• Towards establishing consistency in triage in a tertiary specialty

  2019cites this paper
• How psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study

  2019cites this paper
• Balance of benefits and harms of different blood pressure targets in people with multiple chronic conditions: a quantitative benefit-harm assessment

  2019cites this paper
• Bedeutung von Präferenzen für Spielelemente – Analyse und Empfehlungen für die Anpassung von Spielelementen durch Nutzerpräferenzen

  2019cites this paper
• Challenges to informed consent for exome sequencing: A best–worst scaling experiment

  2019cites this paper
• Outcome preferences of older people with multiple chronic conditions and hypertension: a cross-sectional survey using best-worst scaling

  2019cites this paper
• how psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study

  2019cites this paper
• Caregiver priorities for endpoints to evaluate treatments for Prader-Willi syndrome: a best–worst scaling

  2018cites this paper
• Horizon scanning des cellules CAR-T : mise en place d’une base identifiant les cellules CAR-T en développement

  2018cites this paper
• Valuing Follow-up Programs In Head and Neck Cancer

  2018cites this paper
• Best-worst scaling to assess the most important barriers and facilitators for the use of health technology assessment in Austria

  2018cites this paper
• A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best–Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare

  2018influential citation
• Eliciting Preferences for Clinical Follow-Up in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Using Best-Worst Scaling.

  2017influential citation
• Genetic Counsellors' Preferences for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Discrete Choice Experiment

  2017cites this paper
• Komplexe Entscheidungen im Gesundheitswesen: Die Bewertung und Saldierung von Nutzen und Schaden als Gegenstand der multikriteriellen Entscheidungsanalyse

  2017cites this paper
• Eliciting preferences for clinical follow-up in head and neck cancer patients using best-worst scaling

  2017influential citation
• MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit‐risk preferences: a critical assessment

  2017cites this paper
• Health technology assessment in epilepsy: moving towards patient-centered, efficient care

  2017cites this paper
• Some Results on Pareto Optimal Choice Sets for Estimating Main Effects and Interactions in 2n and 3n Factorial Plans

  2017cites this paper
• Creating Voluntary Payment Programs: Effective Program Design and Ranchers’ Willingness to Conserve Florida Panther Habitat

  2017cites this paper
• Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?

  2016cites this paper
• Measuring patients’ priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: methodological aspects and ranking tasks

  2016cites this paper
• The value of genetic testing: beyond clinical utility

  2016cites this paper
• The Agony of Choice - Analyzing User Preferences regarding Gamification Elements in Learning Management Systems

  2016cites this paper
• Using Best–Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care

  2016cites this paper
• Exploring the effect of design efficiency in individual preference estimation: Operationalizing reliability, validity and feasibility of a value clarification exercise in both efficient- and D-efficient experimental design to determine the optimal number of choice tasks

  2016cites this paper
• Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview

  2016cites this paper
• Les pratiques pharmaceutiques collaboratives en soins de premier recours dans le contexte de l'émergence des TIC

  2016cites this paper
• Using needs-based frameworks for evaluating new technologies: an application to genetic tests.

  2015cites this paper
• Implementation of comparative effectiveness research in personalized medicine applications in oncology: current and future perspectives

  2015cites this paper
• An assessment of Canadian systems for triaging referred out genetic testing

  2015cites this paper
• Value judgments for priority setting criteria in genetic testing: a discrete choice experiment.

  2015cites this paper
• Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experiment

  2015cites this paper
• Choosing a Cancer Surgeon: Analyzing Factors in Patient Decision Making Using a Best–Worst Scaling Methodology

  2014cites this paper
• Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness

  2014cites this paper
• Incorporating societal preferences in reimbursement decisions

  2014cites this paper
• Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?

  2013cites this paper
• Experimentelle Präferenzmessung im Gesundheitswesen mit Hilfe von Best-Worst Scaling (BWS)

  2013cites this paper
• An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.

  2013influential citation
• Applying discrete choice experiments to recent topics in health economics

  2013cites this paper