On behalf of the consequence argument: time, modality, and the nature of free action

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Philosophical Studies

• Publication date

  2013-03-01

• Fields of study

  Philosophy

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/S11098-011-9791-5
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Incompatibilism and the Past

  2012cited by this paper
• Fatalism and the necessity of the present: reply to Campbell

  2010cited by this paper
• Incompatibilism and fatalism: reply to Loss

  2010cited by this paper
• Free will and the necessity of the present

  2009cited by this paper
• Are we free to break the laws

  2008influential reference
• How to Think about the Problem of Free Will

  2008cited by this paper
• Reply to Brueckner

  2008cited by this paper
• Retooling the Consequence Argument

  2008cited by this paper
• Free will and the necessity of the past

  2007cited by this paper
• A Master Argument for Incompatibilism

  2005influential reference
• The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics

  2005cited by this paper
• The Oxford handbook of free will

  2005cited by this paper
• Compatibilism and Incompatibilism: Some Arguments

  2005cited by this paper
• Free Will Remains a Mystery

  2005influential reference
• How Not to Argue for Incompatibilism

  2004cited by this paper
• The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language

  2002cited by this paper
• Warfield’s new argument for incompatibilism

  2002cited by this paper
• Causal Determinism and Human Freedom are Incompatible: A New Argument for Incompatibilism

  2000cited by this paper
• The Mind Argument and Libertarianism

  1998cited by this paper
• A Reconsideration of an Argument against Compatibilism

  1996influential reference
• On an argument for incompatibilism

  1987cited by this paper
• Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting

  1986influential reference
• On Ockham’s Way Out

  1986cited by this paper
• An Essay on Free Will.

  1984cited by this paper
• Accidental Necessity and Logical Determinism

  1983cited by this paper
• ‘Can’ in Theory and Practice: A Possible Worlds Analysis

  1976cited by this paper

• Supervenient fixity and agential possibilities

  2024cites this paper
• The Complex Tapestry of Free Will

  2024cites this paper
• Probabilism: An Open Future Solution to the Actualism/Possibilism Debate

  2023cites this paper
• Freedom and the open future

  2022cites this paper
• Androids, Oracles and Free Will

  2021cites this paper
• Freedom, responsibility and the past A consideration of the new consequence argument

  2018influential citation
• Freedom , responsibility and the past

  2017influential citation
• The Consequence Argument

  2016cites this paper
• Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics

  2015cites this paper
• The Problem of Determinism and Free Wil l Is Not the Problem of Determinism and Free Wil l

  2015cites this paper
• Agential Settling Requires a Conscious Intention

  2015cites this paper
• In Defense of the Direct Argument for Incompatibilism

  2014cites this paper
• Can the Incompatibilist Get Past the No Past Objection

  2013cites this paper