Disarming the Trolley Problem – Why Self-driving Cars do not Need to Choose Whom to Kill

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2016-09-01

• Fields of study

  Engineering

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The need for an environment perception block to address all ASIL levels simultaneously

  2016cited by this paper
• A functional architecture for autonomous driving

  2015cited by this paper
• The Importance of Active Choices in Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment

  2015cited by this paper
• Autonomous Vehicles Need Experimental Ethics: Are We Ready for Utilitarian Cars?

  2015cited by this paper
• ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Piraeus Conference on Seaports Hinterland Connection

  2008cited by this paper
• From operational to tactical driving: A hybrid learning approach for autonomous vehicles

  2008cited by this paper
• National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey

  2008cited by this paper
• Situation Awareness for Tactical Driving

  1997cited by this paper
• Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem.

  1976cited by this paper

• Analysis of autonomous vehicle buyer's decisions: Balancing ethics with Innovation in the trolley dilemma.

  2025cites this paper
• Government's Response to Ethical Dilemmas in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: An Australian Policy Evaluation

  2024influential citation
• Applying ethical theories to the decision-making of self-driving vehicles: A systematic review and integration of the literature

  2023cites this paper
• Towards the Concept of Trust Assurance Case

  2022cites this paper
• Steps Towards Real-world Ethics for Self-driving Cars: Beyond the Trolley Problem

  2021cites this paper
• Steps Toward Real-World Ethics for Self-Driving Cars

  2021cites this paper
• Trolley dilemma in the sky: Context matters when civilians and cadets make remotely piloted aircraft decisions

  2021cites this paper
• Decision support issues in automated driving systems

  2021cites this paper
• "Trolleyology" and autonomous vehicles - moral and legal questions on the application of the doctrine of double effect

  2021cites this paper
• “Choose for No Choose”—Random-Selecting Option for the Trolley Problem in Autonomous Driving

  2020cites this paper
• Building Trust in the Untrustable

  2020cites this paper
• Solving the Single-Vehicle Self-Driving Car Trolley Problem Using Risk Theory and Vehicle Dynamics

  2019cites this paper
• Dilemmata der Maschinen. Künstliche Intelligenz, Ethik und Recht

  2019cites this paper
• Towards a Formal Ethics for Autonomous Cars

  2018cites this paper
• Gry jako moralne laboratorium. Gamifikacja dylematów moralnych bezzałogowych samochodów

  2018cites this paper
• Ethics in Social Autonomous Robots: Decision-Making, Transparency, and Trust

  2018cites this paper
• Introducing ASIL inspired dynamic tactical safety decision framework for automated vehicles

  2017cites this paper
• Using Virtual Reality to Assess Ethical Decisions in Road Traffic Scenarios: Applicability of Value-of-Life-Based Models and Influences of Time Pressure

  2017cites this paper
• Towards Increased Reliability by Objectification of Hazard

  2017cites this paper
• Towards increased reliability by objectification of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of automated automotive systems

  2017cites this paper
• Literature review on the acceptance and road safety, ethical, legal, social and economic implications of automated vehicles

  2017cites this paper
• AI “Ethics by Design”: The Unethical Transfer of an Intransitive AI “Ethics by Design”: The Unethical Transfer of an Intransitive Human Characteristic to AI Artifacts Human Characteristic to AI Artifacts

  year unknowncites this paper