How scary! An analysis of visual communication concerning genetically modified organisms in Italy

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Public Understanding of Science

• Publication date

  2017-07-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Medicine, Environmental Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/0963662516638634PMID 27036664
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Food Quality and Preference

  2017cited by this paper
• Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature

  2016cited by this paper
• Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition.

  2015cited by this paper
• Does a picture tell a thousand words? The uses of digitally produced, multimodal pictures for communicating information about Alzheimer’s disease

  2015cited by this paper
• Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support

  2015cited by this paper
• You Have Been Framed! How Antecedents of Information Need Mediate the Effects of Risk Communication Messages

  2014cited by this paper
• GM-free private standards, public regulation of GM products and mass media

  2014cited by this paper
• An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research

  2014cited by this paper
• Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations.

  2014cited by this paper
• A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops

  2014cited by this paper
• Understanding the power of the picture: the effect of image content on emotional and political responses to terrorism

  2014cited by this paper
• Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet’s potential for closing them

  2014cited by this paper
• Perception of GMOs by scientists and practitioners--the critical role of information flow about transgenic organisms.

  2014cited by this paper
• On the use of imagery for climate change engagement

  2013cited by this paper
• Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification - a systematic review and meta-analysis

  2013cited by this paper
• GMO Standards, Endogenous Policy and the Market for Information

  2013cited by this paper
• New media landscapes and the science information consumer

  2013cited by this paper
• Media attention to GM food cases: An innovation perspective

  2013cited by this paper
• Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review.

  2012cited by this paper
• Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science

  2012cited by this paper
• Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips

  2011cited by this paper
• Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: A Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas for Future Research

  2011cited by this paper
• Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change

  2010cited by this paper
• “Fear Won't Do It”

  2009cited by this paper
• Climate change in the British press: the role of the visual

  2009cited by this paper
• Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations

  2009cited by this paper
• Differences in global risk perceptions of biotechnology and the political economy of the media

  2008cited by this paper
• Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy

  2008cited by this paper
• Opposition to transgenic technologies: ideology, interests and collective action frames

  2008cited by this paper
• Media Use and Health Information Seeking: An Empirical Test of Complementarity Theory

  2008cited by this paper
• Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food

  2008cited by this paper
• The Power of Visual Material: Persuasion, Emotion and Identification

  2008cited by this paper
• Information needs and risk perception as predictors of risk information seeking

  2008cited by this paper
• Factors Influencing Urban Consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods

  2007cited by this paper
• Localized Debates of Agricultural Biotechnology in Community Newspapers: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Media Frames and Sources

  2007cited by this paper
• Mass media framing of biotechnology news

  2007cited by this paper
• The reporting of the risks from genetically modified organisms in the mass media, 2002–2004

  2007cited by this paper
• Are perceptions of ‘risks’ and ‘benefits’ of genetically modified food (in)dependent?

  2007cited by this paper
• In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance

  2007cited by this paper
• Picture this: emotional and political responses to photographs of the Kenneth Bigley kidnapping

  2006cited by this paper
• “Words of mass destruction”: British newspaper coverage of the genetically modified food debate, expert and non-expert reactions

  2006cited by this paper
• Mass Media and Biotechnology: Knowledge Gaps Within and Between European Countries

  2005cited by this paper
• Agriculture and the food industry in the information age

  2005cited by this paper
• Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy

  2005cited by this paper
• Who Does the Public Trust? The Case of Genetically Modified Food in the United States

  2005cited by this paper
• Genetically Modified Organisms in the Portuguese Press: thematization and anchoring

  2005cited by this paper
• GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception

  2004cited by this paper
• Media Coverage of Biotech Foods and Influence on Consumer Choice

  2004cited by this paper
• Comparison of the Risk Perceptions of Italian and United States Consumers for GMO Foods

  2004cited by this paper
• Expert and Public Perception of Risk from Biotechnology

  2004cited by this paper
• Who Do Consumers Trust for Information: The Case of Genetically Modified Foods?

  2004cited by this paper
• The Flow of Scientific Knowledge from Lab to the Lay Public

  2004cited by this paper
• Importance of fear in the case of genetically modified food

  2004cited by this paper
• Risk Perceptions of Urban Italian and United States Consumers for Genetically Modified Foods

  2004cited by this paper
• Political Economy of the Media and Consumer Perceptions of Biotechnology

  2004cited by this paper
• Public Attitudes toward Agrobiotechnology: The Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions on the Impact of Trust, Awareness, and Outrage

  2004cited by this paper
• MEDIA COVERAGE OF AGROBIOTECHNOLOGY: DID THE BUTTERFLY HAVE AN EFFECT?

  2003cited by this paper
• The Biotechnology Communication Paradox: Experimental Evidence and the Need for a New Strategy

  2003cited by this paper
• Consumer perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods. What kind of knowledge matters?

  2003cited by this paper
• Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks.

  2003cited by this paper
• Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops

  2002cited by this paper
• Consumer attitudes toward the use of gene technology in tomato production

  2002cited by this paper
• Biotech remains unloved by the more informed

  2002cited by this paper
• The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk

  2002cited by this paper
• Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions With Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey

  2001cited by this paper
• The role of socioeconomic factors and lifestyle variables in attitude and the demand for genetically modified foods.

  2000cited by this paper
• Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.

  1999cited by this paper
• Reactions to information about genetic engineering: impact of source characteristics, perceived personal relevance, and persuasiveness

  1999cited by this paper
• Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.

  1999cited by this paper
• Consumer acceptance of transgenic crops

  1998cited by this paper
• Pictorial superiority effect.

  1976cited by this paper
• Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding?

  1973cited by this paper

• How French culture influences the framing of genetic modifications on the internet: Insights from Google-based corpus analysis

  2024cites this paper
• Too Real to be Questioned: Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Spread of Online Scientific Rumors in China

  2023cites this paper
• Toward Rhetorically Infused Methods for Relational Network Modeling: The Visualization of Agency in Seismic Risk Visuals

  2023cites this paper
• Food to politics: Representations of genetically modified organisms in cartoons on the Internet in China

  2021influential citation
• Factor affecting public acceptance on Genetically Modified Food: A Review

  2021cites this paper
• A review of research on public attitudes to Genetically Modified foods and related areas and their implications for Genome Editing of Farmed Animals

  2021cites this paper
• Consumers' Choice Behavior for Cisgenic Food: Exploring the Role of Time Preferences

  2020cites this paper
• Of Society, Nature, and Health: How Perceptions of Specific Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Foods Shape Public Rejection

  2020cites this paper
• Effects of Message Presentation Type on GM Food Risk Perception, Similarity Judgment, and Attitude

  2020cites this paper
• Benefits and risks of genetically modified mosquitoes: news and Twitter framing across issue-attention cycle

  2020cites this paper
• Distinguishing scientific knowledge: The impact of different measures of knowledge on genetically modified food attitudes

  2019cites this paper
• Is Opposition to Genetically Modified Food “Morally Absolutist”? A Consequence-Based Perspective

  2019cites this paper
• Implications of Media-Scientists’ Relationship on Crop Biotechnology Debate in Uganda

  2019cites this paper
• Mismatch between food sustainability and consumer acceptance toward innovation technologies among Millennial students: The case of Shelf Life Extension

  2018cites this paper
• Framing genetically modified mosquitoes in the online news and Twitter: Intermedia frame setting in the issue-attention cycle

  2018cites this paper
• Visuelle Wissenschaftskommunikation: Zur visuellen Darstellung von Wissenschaft, ihrer Produktion, Nutzung und Wirkung

  2018cites this paper
• Negotiating Matters of Concern: Expertise, Uncertainty, and Agency in Rhetoric of Science

  2018cites this paper
• What lies beneath? Fear vs. disgust as affective predictors of absolutist opposition to genetically modified food and other new technologies

  2017cites this paper