CT colonography: an update

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  European Radiology

• Publication date

  2008-03-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0764-1PMID 17899101
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Factors Associated with Incomplete Colonoscopy: A Population-Based Study

  2008cited by this paper
• Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study.

  2007cited by this paper
• Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography

  2007cited by this paper
• CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy.

  2007influential reference
• European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): Consensus statement on CT colonography

  2007cited by this paper
• Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Colonoscopy in Israeli Patients in an Open Access Referral System

  2007cited by this paper
• Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography.

  2006cited by this paper
• Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation.

  2006cited by this paper
• CT colonography using 360° virtual dissection : A feasibility study

  2006cited by this paper
• Bowel preparation for CT-colonography: comparison of two different cleansing protocols.

  2006cited by this paper
• CT colonography using 360-degree virtual dissection: a feasibility study.

  2006cited by this paper
• Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography.

  2006cited by this paper
• Cancer Statistics, 2006

  2006cited by this paper
• A Consensus Document on Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Prepared by a Task Force From The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

  2006cited by this paper
• CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal.

  2005influential reference
• Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy.

  2005cited by this paper
• Colon imaging: computed tomographic colonography.

  2005cited by this paper
• Meta-Analysis: Computed Tomographic Colonography

  2005cited by this paper
• A retrospective evaluation of patient acceptance of computed tomography colonography (“virtual colonoscopy”) in comparison with conventional colonoscopy in an average risk screening population

  2005cited by this paper
• CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting.

  2005cited by this paper
• Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon.

  2005cited by this paper
• Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.

  2005cited by this paper
• CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps

  2005cited by this paper
• Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough?

  2005cited by this paper
• CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy

  2005cited by this paper
• Virtual Colonoscopy

  2005cited by this paper
• CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.

  2005cited by this paper
• Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume

  2005cited by this paper
• Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.

  2004cited by this paper
• Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?

  2004cited by this paper
• Colonic surveillance by CT colonography using axial images only

  2004cited by this paper
• CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance

  2004cited by this paper
• Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy.

  2004cited by this paper
• Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.

  2004cited by this paper
• Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.

  2004cited by this paper
• Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography.

  2004cited by this paper
• Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results

  2003cited by this paper
• Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

  2003cited by this paper
• Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience

  2003cited by this paper
• Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter.

  2003cited by this paper
• Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning

  2003cited by this paper
• CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.

  2003cited by this paper
• Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen.

  2003cited by this paper
• Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps.

  2003cited by this paper
• CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations.

  2003cited by this paper
• Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography

  2003cited by this paper
• Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.

  2003cited by this paper
• Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection.

  2003cited by this paper
• Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer.

  2002cited by this paper
• CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon

  2002cited by this paper
• Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods

  2002cited by this paper
• Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.

  2002cited by this paper
• Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy.

  2002cited by this paper
• Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.

  2002cited by this paper
• Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.

  2002cited by this paper
• Computer-assisted detection of colonic polyps with CT colonography using neural networks and binary classification trees.

  2002cited by this paper
• Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?

  2002cited by this paper
• Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography.

  2002cited by this paper
• Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography.

  2001cited by this paper
• Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy.

  2001cited by this paper
• Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography.

  2001cited by this paper
• CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study.

  2001cited by this paper
• Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.

  2001cited by this paper
• Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important?

  2001cited by this paper
• Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.

  2000cited by this paper
• Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

  2000cited by this paper
• Patient acceptance of virtual colonoscopy.

  2000cited by this paper
• Patient acceptance of virtual colonoscopy.

  2000cited by this paper
• Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies.

  1999cited by this paper
• Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon.

  1999cited by this paper
• CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.

  1999cited by this paper
• An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy)

  1999cited by this paper
• Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy.

  1999cited by this paper
• Relative frequency of upper gastrointestinal and colonic lesions in patients with positive fecal occult-blood tests.

  1998cited by this paper
• Relative Frequency of Upper Gastrointestinal and Colonic Lesions in Patients with Positive Fecal Occult-Blood Tests

  1998cited by this paper
• Virtual endoscopy: what's in a name?

  1998cited by this paper
• CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.

  1997cited by this paper
• Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress.

  1996cited by this paper
• Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy

  1995cited by this paper
• Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

  1993cited by this paper
• The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s.

  1993cited by this paper
• Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

  1993cited by this paper
• The national polyp study design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps

  1992cited by this paper
• A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

  1992cited by this paper
• Screening for colorectal cancer.

  1991cited by this paper
• A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

  1990cited by this paper
• The National Polyp Study

  1990cited by this paper
• Distribution of colonic polyps: increased incidence of proximal lesions in older patients.

  1985cited by this paper
• Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool.

  1982cited by this paper
• Epidemiology of polyps and cancer.

  1978cited by this paper

• Chapter 12 Virtual Colonoscopy

  2019influential citation
• Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

  2016cites this paper
• Reactive Edema after Endoscopic Polipectomy Simulating a Polypoid Lesion: A New Pitfall in CT Colonography

  2015cites this paper
• DT-kolografi med fekal taggning och reducerad tarmrengöring

  2014cites this paper
• Screening for colorectal cancer : CTC vs . OC

  2013influential citation
• UPDATE IN RADIOLOGY CT colonography : What radiologists need to know

  2013cites this paper
• Diagnosis of bowel diseases: the role of imaging and ultrasonography.

  2013cites this paper
• CT-Colonography after Incomplete Colonoscopy : Our Experience in a Tertiary Care

  2013cites this paper
• A Complete System for Candidate Polyps Detection in Virtual Colonoscopy

  2012cites this paper
• Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy

  2012cites this paper
• Imaging in Clinical Trials

  2012cites this paper
• Segmentation and polyp detection in virtual colonoscopy : a complete system for computer aided diagnosis

  2012cites this paper
• Development of an Automatic Adjustable Colonoscope

  2011cites this paper
• A Complete System for Polyps Flagging in Virtual Colonoscopy

  2011cites this paper
• Segmentation and polyp detection in virtual colonoscopy : a complete system for computer aided diagnosis

  2011cites this paper
• Development of a colonoscopy add-on device for improvement of the intubation process

  2011influential citation
• Colonografía por TC. Lo que el radiólogo debe conocer

  2011cites this paper
• [CT colonography: what radiologists need to know].

  2011cites this paper
• Scopes Too Flexible...and Too Stiff

  2010cites this paper
• Imaging of the gastrointestinal tract-novel technologies.

  2009cites this paper
• Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Polyps and Colorectal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2009cites this paper
• Clinicopathologic characteristics of second primary cancers in patients with gastric cancer

  2009cites this paper
• Current status of colorectal cancer in Queensland , 1982 to 2005

  2008cites this paper
• CT-Kolografie: Leitlinie der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gastrointestinale Diagnostik der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft zur Indikation und technischen Durchführung der endoluminalen Dickdarmdiagnostik mittels Computertomografie (sog. virtuelle Koloskopie)

  2008cites this paper
• Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography.

  2006cites this paper
• Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation.

  2006cites this paper
• Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography.

  2006cites this paper