Discourse segmentation is the first step in building discourse parsers. Most work on discourse segmentation does not scale to real-world discourse parsing across languages, for two reasons: (i) models rely on constituent trees, and (ii) experiments have relied on gold standard identification of sentence and token boundaries. We therefore investigate to what extent constituents can be replaced with universal dependencies, or left out completely, as well as how state-of-the-art segmenters fare in the absence of sentence boundaries. Our results show that dependency information is less useful than expected, but we provide a fully scalable, robust model that only relies on part-of-speech information, and show that it performs well across languages in the absence of any gold-standard annotation.
Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much
Chloé Braud,Ophélie Lacroix,Anders Søgaard
Published 2017 in Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Publication date
2017-09-01
- Fields of study
Linguistics, Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-36 of 36 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-15 of 15 citing papers · Page 1 of 1