In multi-attribute utility theory, it is often not easy to elicit precise values for the scaling weights representing the relative importance of criteria. A very widespread approach is to gather incomplete information. A recent approach for dealing with such situations is to use information about each alternative's intensity of dominance, known as dominance measuring methods. Different dominance measuring methods have been proposed, and simulation studies have been carried out to compare these methods with each other and with other approaches but only when ordinal information about weights is available. In this paper, we use Monte Carlo simulation techniques to analyse the performance of and adapt such methods to deal with weight intervals, weights fitting independent normal probability distributions or weights represented by fuzzy numbers. Moreover, dominance measuring method performance is also compared with a widely used methodology dealing with incomplete information on weights, the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). SMAA is based on exploring the weight space to describe the evaluations that would make each alternative the preferred one. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Dominance Measuring Method Performance under Incomplete Information about Weights
A. Mateos,A. Jiménez,J. F. Blanco
Published 2012 in Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2012
- Venue
Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
- Publication date
2012-05-01
- Fields of study
Mathematics, Economics
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-29 of 29 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-12 of 12 citing papers · Page 1 of 1