An Empirical Study of Differences between Conversion Schemes and Annotation Guidelines

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  International Conference on Dependency Linguistics

• Publication date

  2013-08-01

• Fields of study

  Linguistics, Computer Science

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Down-stream effects of tree-to-dependency conversions

  2013cited by this paper
• Training Parsers on Incompatible Treebanks

  2013cited by this paper
• Cross-Framework Evaluation for Statistical Parsing

  2012cited by this paper
• Modality and Negation: An Introduction to the Special Issue

  2012cited by this paper
• Overview of the 2012 Shared Task on Parsing the Web

  2012cited by this paper
• *SEM 2012 Shared Task: Resolving the Scope and Focus of Negation

  2012cited by this paper
• Learnability-Based Syntactic Annotation Design

  2012influential reference
• Speculation and Negation: Rules, Rankers, and the Role of Syntax

  2012cited by this paper
• Who Did What to Whom? A Contrastive Study of Syntacto-Semantic Dependencies

  2012cited by this paper
• UiO 2: Sequence-labeling Negation Using Dependency Features

  2012cited by this paper
• Reordering by Parsing

  2011cited by this paper
• Better Hypothesis Testing for Statistical Machine Translation: Controlling for Optimizer Instability

  2011cited by this paper
• Top Accuracy and Fast Dependency Parsing is not a Contradiction

  2010cited by this paper
• Syntactic and Semantic Structure for Opinion Expression Detection

  2010cited by this paper
• On the Derivation Perplexity of Treebanks

  2010influential reference
• Quadratic-Time Dependency Parsing for Machine Translation

  2009cited by this paper
• Generalizing Dependency Features for Opinion Mining

  2009cited by this paper
• Using a Dependency Parser to Improve SMT for Subject-Object-Verb Languages

  2009cited by this paper
• Dependency-based Syntactic–Semantic Analysis with PropBank and NomBank

  2008cited by this paper
• Characterizing the Errors of Data-Driven Dependency Parsers

  2007cited by this paper
• The CoNLL 2007 Shared Task on Dependency Parsing

  2007influential reference
• Extended Constituent-to-Dependency Conversion for English

  2007influential reference
• METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments

  2007cited by this paper
• Are These Documents Written from Different Perspectives? A Test of Different Perspectives Based on Statistical Distribution Divergence

  2006cited by this paper
• Discriminative Sentence Compression with Soft Syntactic Evidence

  2006cited by this paper
• Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing

  2003cited by this paper
• Statistical Dependency Analysis with Support Vector Machines

  2003cited by this paper
• Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation

  2002cited by this paper
• Summarization beyond sentence extraction: A probabilistic approach to sentence compression

  2002influential reference
• Discriminative Training Methods for Hidden Markov Models: Theory and Experiments with Perceptron Algorithms

  2002cited by this paper
• Support-Vector Networks

  1995cited by this paper
• Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank

  1993influential reference

• Discovering the structure of natural language sentences by semi-supervised methods

  2018cites this paper
• Multi-source Cross-lingual Delexicalized Parser Transfer: Prague or Stanford?

  2015cites this paper
• Parsing Natural Language Sentences by Semi-supervised Methods

  2015cites this paper
• Identifying Cascading Errors using Constraints in Dependency Parsing

  2015cites this paper
• Evaluating Parsers with Dependency Constraints

  2015cites this paper
• Dependency parsing representation effects on the accuracy of semantic applications — an example of an inflective language

  2014cites this paper
• Constructions in Latvian Treebank: the Impact of Annotation Decisions on the Dependency Parsing Performance

  2014cites this paper