Researchers’ views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Genetics in Medicine

• Publication date

  2014-12-11

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/gim.2014.163PMID 25503499PMCID PMC4465418
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.

  2014cited by this paper
• Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

  2014cited by this paper
• Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: A conjoint analysis

  2014cited by this paper
• The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and Recommendations

  2014cited by this paper
• Anticipate and communicate: Ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer contexts (December 2013 report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues).

  2014cited by this paper
• Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.

  2014cited by this paper
• Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?

  2013cited by this paper
• ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing

  2013cited by this paper
• Experiences and Attitudes of Genome Investigators Regarding Return of Individual Genetic Test Results

  2013cited by this paper
• Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification

  2013cited by this paper
• Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting

  2013cited by this paper
• Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process

  2013cited by this paper
• Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.

  2013cited by this paper
• Anticipate and Communicate: Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts

  2013cited by this paper
• Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research

  2013cited by this paper
• Researchers’ views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings

  2013cited by this paper
• Incidental findings in the era of whole genome sequencing?

  2013cited by this paper
• Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

  2012cited by this paper
• Moral Entanglements: The Ancillary-Care Obligations of Medical Researchers

  2012cited by this paper
• Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets

  2012cited by this paper
• Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.

  2011cited by this paper
• Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.

  2010cited by this paper
• Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research

  2008cited by this paper
• Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study

  2008cited by this paper
• Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations

  2008cited by this paper

• Genomic and Health Data as Fuel to Advance a Health Data Economy for Artificial Intelligence

  2025cites this paper
• Legal and Ethical Regulation of Reporting of Secondary Findings

  2024cites this paper
• Preferences of biobank participants for receiving actionable genomic test results: results of a re-contacting study

  2021cites this paper
• Burden or benefit? Effects of providing education about and the option to request additional genomic findings from diagnostic exome sequencing: A randomized controlled trial.

  2021cites this paper
• Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.

  2021cites this paper
• Should Feedback of Individual Results be Integrated into the Consent Process in African Genomics? Participants’ Views from an HIV-TB Genomics Research Project in Botswana

  2021cites this paper
• Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives

  2021cites this paper
• Opportunities and challenges of implementation models of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice

  2020cites this paper
• Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies

  2019cites this paper
• Implications of the Revised Common Rule for Human Participant Research

  2019cites this paper
• Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants’ Genomic Results

  2018cites this paper
• Standardizing return of participant results

  2018cites this paper
• Patient perspectives on the use of categories of conditions for decision making about genomic carrier screening results

  2018cites this paper
• Public’s Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It’s (Almost) All about the Choice

  2017cites this paper
• Anticipating the Ethical Challenges of Psychiatric Genetic Testing

  2017cites this paper
• Engaging Hmong adults in genomic and pharmacogenomic research: Toward reducing health disparities in genomic knowledge using a community-based participatory research approach

  2017cites this paper
• Effect of Public Deliberation on Attitudes toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing

  2017cites this paper
• Genomic Testing: a Genetic Counselor’s Personal Reflection on Three Years of Consenting and Testing

  2016cites this paper