Researchers at Brigham Young University studied first-year students’ information evaluation behaviours of open-access, popular news-based, non-academic source material on a variety of subjects. Using think-aloud protocols and screen-recording, researchers coded most and least used evaluation behaviours. Students most used an article’s sources, previous experience with the source or subject matter, or a bias judgement to decide whether the source was reliable. Researchers also compared what students said was important when evaluating information vs. what behaviours students actually exhibited and found significant differences between the two. Namely, students did not think their previous experience or bias judgement affected the way they assessed sources; however, both behaviours played prominently in their observed source evaluation techniques across the study.
Source evaluation behaviours of first-year university students
Elise Silva,Jessica Green,C. Walker
Published 2018 in Journal of Information Literacy
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
Journal of Information Literacy
- Publication date
2018-12-04
- Fields of study
Education, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
- No references are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-14 of 14 citing papers · Page 1 of 1