Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Experimental Brain Research

• Publication date

  2011-04-12

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Engineering, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00221-011-2673-4PMID 21484393
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning

  2010cited by this paper
• Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: two plans for two hands?

  2010cited by this paper
• Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions

  2010cited by this paper
• Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance

  2010cited by this paper
• Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination

  2009cited by this paper
• Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance

  2008cited by this paper
• Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects

  2008cited by this paper
• Re-examining structural constraints on the initiation of bimanual movements: the role of starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.

  2007cited by this paper
• Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements

  2007cited by this paper
• End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation.

  2006cited by this paper
• Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation.

  2005cited by this paper
• The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics

  2004cited by this paper
• Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements

  2004cited by this paper
• Evidence of Motor Planning in Infant Reaching Behavior

  2003cited by this paper
• The End-State Comfort Effect in Bimanual Grip Selection

  2003cited by this paper
• Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination

  2001cited by this paper
• Spatial Conceptual Influences on the Coordination of Bimanual Actions: When a Dual Task Becomes a Single Task

  2001cited by this paper
• Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect.

  1999cited by this paper
• From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.

  1996cited by this paper
• Dissociation of Spatial and Temporal Coupling in the Bimanual Movements of Callosotomy Patients

  1996cited by this paper
• Two functionally different synergies during arm reaching movements involving the trunk.

  1995cited by this paper
• Plans for object manipulation

  1993cited by this paper
• Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task.

  1991cited by this paper
• The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension.

  1991cited by this paper
• Coordination.

  1990cited by this paper
• Motor representation and control

  1990cited by this paper
• Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw.

  1989cited by this paper
• Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

  1987cited by this paper
• Control of multimovement coordination: sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming.

  1984cited by this paper
• The timing of natural prehension movements.

  1984cited by this paper
• Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination.

  1984cited by this paper
• Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures.

  1984cited by this paper
• On the coordination of two-handed movements.

  1979cited by this paper
• The thesis of the efference-mediation of vision cannot be rationalized

  1979cited by this paper
• On the normal use of reflexes.

  1972cited by this paper
• On the normal use of reflexes.

  1972cited by this paper

• Bimanual coordination during reach-to-grasp actions is sensitive to task goal with distinctions between left- and right-hemispheric stroke

  2022cites this paper
• Anticipating different grips reduces bimanual end-state comfort: A tradeoff between goal-related and means-related planning processes

  2018cites this paper
• Cognitive framing in action.

  2016cites this paper
• Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness

  2015cites this paper
• The relation between measures of cognitive and motor functioning in 5- to 6-year-old children

  2015cites this paper
• Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.

  2015cites this paper
• The effect of endpoint congruency on bimanual transport and rotation tasks

  2015cites this paper
• Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.

  2015cites this paper
• Cognitive planning in manual action - action selection in multi-segment object manipulation tasks

  2014cites this paper
• Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation

  2014cites this paper
• Problems in planning bimanually incongruent grasp postures relate to simultaneous response specification processes.

  2014cites this paper
• The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task

  2014cites this paper
• Limits of end-state planning.

  2014cites this paper
• Coordination between hand and trunk movements in a Fitts' Law task

  2014influential citation
• Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review

  2014cites this paper
• Representation and learning in motor action – Bridges between experimental research and cognitive robotics

  2013cites this paper
• Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors.

  2013cites this paper
• Perturbations in Action Goal Influence Bimanual Grasp Posture Planning

  2013cites this paper
• Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, Volume 18, 2013, List of Reviewers

  2013cites this paper
• Interlimb coordination during a cooperative bimanual object manipulation task

  2013cites this paper
• The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing

  2012cites this paper
• Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning

  2012cites this paper
• Exercise training to improve independence and quality of life in impaired individuals.

  2012cites this paper
• Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task

  2012cites this paper
• Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children

  2012cites this paper
• Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children

  2011cites this paper
• An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task

  2011cites this paper
• Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task.

  2011influential citation