Does Random Consideration Explain Behavior when Choice is Hard? Evidence from a Large-scale Experiment

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  arXiv: General Economics

• Publication date

  2018-12-22

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Economics

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Inferring Cognitive Heterogeneity From Aggregate Choices

  2020cited by this paper
• Discrete Choice under Risk with Limited Consideration

  2019influential reference
• Random consideration and choice: A case study of "default" options

  2019cited by this paper
• Random Choice and Learning

  2019cited by this paper
• Testing the Random Utility Hypothesis Directly

  2019cited by this paper
• Heterogeneous Choice Sets and Preferences

  2019cited by this paper
• Eliciting risk preferences using choice lists

  2019cited by this paper
• Separating Predicted Randomness from Noise

  2018influential reference
• The perception-adjusted Luce model

  2018cited by this paper
• Rational Inattention, Optimal Consideration Sets, and Stochastic Choice

  2018influential reference
• The Imbalanced Luce Model ∗

  2018cited by this paper
• A Random Attention Model

  2017influential reference
• Random Categorization and Bounded Rationality

  2017influential reference
• Advertising, Consumer Awareness, and Choice: Evidence from the U.S. Banking Industry

  2017cited by this paper
• DISCRETE CHOICE AND RATIONAL INATTENTION: A GENERAL EQUIVALENCE RESULT

  2017influential reference
• Single-Crossing Random Utility Models

  2017influential reference
• When more is less: Limited consideration

  2017cited by this paper
• NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT DO CONSUMERS CONSIDER BEFORE THEY CHOOSE? IDENTIFICATION FROM ASYMMETRIC DEMAND RESPONSES

  2017influential reference
• Satisficing and stochastic choice

  2016influential reference
• Identifying Consumer Inattention: A Product-Availability Approach

  2016cited by this paper
• Stochastic Representative Agent

  2016influential reference
• Menu‐Dependent Stochastic Feasibility

  2016influential reference
• Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models

  2016influential reference
• Discounting, Dynamic Consistency, and Cooperation in an Infinitely Repeated Game Experiment∗

  2016cited by this paper
• Power to Choose? An Analysis of Consumer Inertia in the Residential Electricity Market

  2015cited by this paper
• Quantifying Search and Switching Costs in the US Auto Insurance Industry

  2015cited by this paper
• Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis

  2015cited by this paper
• Pennies for Your Thoughts: Costly Product Consideration and Purchase Quantity Thresholds

  2015cited by this paper
• Stochastic Choice and Revealed Perturbed Utility

  2015influential reference
• NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE IMPACT OF CONSUMER INATTENTION ON INSURER PRICING IN THE MEDICARE PART D PROGRAM

  2015cited by this paper
• Quantifying Search and Switching Costs in the U.S. Auto Insurance Industry

  2014cited by this paper
• Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization

  2014influential reference
• Preference for Flexibility and Random Choice: an Experimental Analysis

  2014influential reference
• On The Identification of Utility and Attention Based on Discrete-Continuous Choice

  2014cited by this paper
• Demand Estimation Under Incomplete Product Availability

  2013influential reference
• Testing Models of Consumer Search Using Data on Web Browsing and Purchasing Behavior

  2012cited by this paper
• Spontaneous giving and calculated greed

  2012influential reference
• Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets

  2012influential reference
• Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study

  2011cited by this paper
• Choice Set Heterogeneity and the Role of Advertising: An Analysis with Micro and Macro Data

  2010cited by this paper
• The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market

  2010influential reference
• Revealed Attention

  2009cited by this paper
• LIMITED INFORMATION AND ADVERTISING IN THE U.S. PERSONAL COMPUTER INDUSTRY

  2008influential reference
• Costly Information Acquisition: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly Rational Model

  2006influential reference
• Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice

  2006cited by this paper
• A simple test of expected utility theory using professional traders.

  2005cited by this paper
• Retrieving Unobserved Consideration Sets from Household Panel Data

  2005cited by this paper
• Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects

  2002influential reference
• Consideration: Review of Research and Prospects for Future Insights

  1997cited by this paper
• Some Characterizations of Lower Probabilities and Other Monotone Capacities through the use of Möbius Inversion

  1989influential reference
• A representation theorem for finite random scale systems

  1978cited by this paper
• Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice.

  1972cited by this paper
• Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses (1960)

  1959influential reference

• The Core of Bayesian Persuasion

  2023cites this paper
• Stochastic choice with bounded processing capacity

  2023cites this paper
• Mixture Choice Data: Revealing Preferences and Cognition

  2022cites this paper
• Disentangling preferences and limited attention: Random-utility models with consideration sets

  2021cites this paper
• Random Rank-Dependent Expected Utility

  2021influential citation
• Inferring Cognitive Heterogeneity From Aggregate Choices

  2020cites this paper
• Categorizing Information Mistakes

  2020influential citation
• T H ] 1 2 A ug 2 02 0 The Decision-Conflict and Multicriteria Logit ∗

  2020cites this paper
• Peer Effects in Random Consideration Sets

  2019cites this paper
• A pr 2 01 9 Peer Effects in Random Consideration Sets ( Preliminary )

  2019cites this paper