Clinical Factors that May Affect Outcome in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement. What Is the Evidence

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04547-9_26
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Introducing levels of evidence to the journal

  2011cited by this paper
• An Evidence-Based Medicine Approach in Determining Factors That May Affect Outcome in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

  2008influential reference
• Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients.

  2007cited by this paper
• CHARITÉ Versus ProDisc: A Comparative Study of a Minimum 3-Year Follow-up

  2007influential reference
• Total Lumbar Disc Replacement: Different Results for Different Levels

  2007influential reference
• Long-term Results of One-Level Lumbar Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up of the CHARITÉ Artificial Disc in 106 Patients

  2007influential reference
• Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study of the ProDisc®-L Total Disc Replacement Versus Circumferential Fusion for the Treatment of 1-Level Degenerative Disc Disease

  2007cited by this paper
• Charité total disc replacement—clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years

  2006influential reference
• Clinical Results of Total Lumbar Disc Replacement With ProDisc II: Three-Year Results for Different Indications

  2006influential reference
• A prospective morphological study of facet joint integrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITÉ™ Artificial Disc

  2006cited by this paper
• Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.

  2006influential reference
• Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Using ProDisc II: A Prospective Study With a 2-Year Minimum Follow-up

  2006influential reference
• Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

  2006cited by this paper
• Computed Tomography Assessment of the Accuracy of In Vivo Placement of Artificial Discs in the Lumbar Spine Including Radiographic and Clinical Consequences

  2006influential reference
• The Treatment of Disabling Multilevel Lumbar Discogenic Low Back Pain With Total Disc Arthroplasty Utilizing the ProDisc Prosthesis: A Prospective Study With 2-Year Minimum Follow-up

  2005cited by this paper
• Point of view: Commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc.

  2005cited by this paper
• Sicily statement on evidence-based practice

  2005cited by this paper
• Correlation Between Range of Motion and Outcome After Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: 8.6-Year Follow-up

  2005influential reference
• Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up.

  2005influential reference
• Clinical results of charité lumbar total disc replacement.

  2005cited by this paper
• A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemptions Study of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement With the CHARITÉ™ Artificial Disc Versus Lumbar Fusion: Part I: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes

  2005cited by this paper
• Clinical and Radiological Outcomes With the Charité™ Artificial Disc: A 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up

  2005cited by this paper
• The Treatment of Disabling Single-Level Lumbar Discogenic Low Back Pain With Total Disc Arthroplasty Utilizing the Prodisc Prosthesis: A Prospective Study With 2-Year Minimum Follow-up

  2005influential reference
• Influence of Facet and Posterior Muscle Degeneration on Clinical Results of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Two-Year Follow-Up

  2005cited by this paper
• The Prevalence of Contraindications to Total Disc Replacement in a Cohort of Lumbar Surgical Patients

  2004cited by this paper
• Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement.

  2004influential reference
• The National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

  2003cited by this paper
• Complications of Artificial Disc Replacement: A Report of 27 Patients with the SB Charité Disc

  2003cited by this paper
• Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.

  2003cited by this paper
• Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results

  2002influential reference
• Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications

  2002influential reference
• Increasing age does not affect good outcome after lumbar disc replacement

  2000influential reference
• Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients

  1999influential reference
• Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis: Results and Prospects for the Year 2000

  1997influential reference
• Results of Disc Prosthesis After a Minimum Follow‐Up Period of 2 Years

  1996cited by this paper
• Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't

  1996cited by this paper

• Current Situation of Design Criteria for Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis

  2013cites this paper
• Surgery for low back pain

  2010cites this paper