Evaluating speech synthesis intelligibility using Amazon Mechanical Turk

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  Speech Synthesis Workshop

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Linguistics, Computer Science, Engineering

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Creating Speech and Language Data With Amazon’s Mechanical Turk

  2010cited by this paper
• Cheap, Fast and Good Enough: Automatic Speech Recognition with Non-Expert Transcription

  2010influential reference
• Using the Amazon Mechanical Turk for transcription of spoken language

  2010cited by this paper
• The Blizzard Challenge 2010

  2010cited by this paper
• Demographics of Mechanical Turk

  2010cited by this paper
• The Blizzard Challenge 2009

  2009influential reference
• Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

  2009cited by this paper
• Robust Speaker-Adaptive HMM-Based Text-to-Speech Synthesis

  2009cited by this paper
• Prediction of the Intelligibility for Speech in Real-Life Background Noises for Subjects With Normal Hearing

  2008cited by this paper
• Cheap and Fast – But is it Good? Evaluating Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks

  2008cited by this paper
• Implementing a Class of Permutation Tests: The coin Package

  2008cited by this paper
• Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk

  2008cited by this paper
• The HMM-based speech synthesis system (HTS) version 2.0

  2007cited by this paper
• Analysis methods for assessing TTS intelligibility

  2007cited by this paper
• A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners.

  2005cited by this paper
• Segmental intelligibility of four currently used text-to-speech synthesis methods.

  2003cited by this paper
• Standards for Internet-based experimenting.

  2002cited by this paper
• The SUS test: A method for the assessment of text-to-speech synthesis intelligibility using Semantically Unpredictable Sentences

  1996cited by this paper
• The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates.

  1990influential reference

• Comparing online versus laboratory measures of speech perception in older children and adolescents

  2024cites this paper
• Experimental evaluation of MOS, AB and BWS listening test designs

  2024cites this paper
• INTELLIGIBILITY ENHANCEMENT OF SPEECH IN NOISE

  2023cites this paper
• Perception of regional and nonnative accents: a comparison of museum laboratory and online data collection

  2023influential citation
• A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control

  2023cites this paper
• Acoustic unit discovery using transient and steady-state regions in speech and its applications

  2021cites this paper
• Binaural speech intelligibility tests conducted remotely over the Internet compared with tests under controlled laboratory conditions

  2021cites this paper
• Voice conversion with parallel/non-parallel data and synthetic speech detection

  2019cites this paper
• Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences

  2019cites this paper
• Effect of Number of Stimuli on Users Perception of Different Speech Degradations. A Crowdsourcing Case Study

  2018cites this paper
• A Spectrally Weighted Mixture of Least Square Error and Wasserstein Discriminator Loss for Generative SPSS

  2018cites this paper
• Influence of Number of Stimuli for Subjective Speech Quality Assessment in Crowdsourcing

  2018cites this paper
• A Log Domain Pulse Model for Parametric Speech Synthesis

  2018cites this paper
• Waveform-Based Speaker Representations for Speech Synthesis

  2018cites this paper
• Diphthong Synthesis using the Three-Dimensional Dynamic Digital Waveguide Mesh

  2017cites this paper
• A Crowdsourced Speech Intelligibility Test that Agrees With, Has Higher Repeatability Than, Lab Tests

  2017cites this paper
• Integrated speaker-adaptive speech synthesis

  2017cites this paper
• Crowdsourcing Quality of Experience Experiments

  2017cites this paper
• Evaluation in the Crowd. Crowdsourcing and Human-Centered Experiments

  2017cites this paper
• An Exemplar-Based Approach to Frequency Warping for Voice Conversion

  2017cites this paper
• A Pulse Model in Log-domain for a Uniform Synthesizer

  2016cites this paper
• Head motion synthesis: evaluation and a template motion approach

  2016cites this paper
• Bootstrapping Development of a Cloud-Based Spoken Dialog System in the Educational Domain From Scratch Using Crowdsourced Data

  2016cites this paper
• Toward Improved Audio CAPTCHAs Based on Auditory Perception and Language Understanding

  2016cites this paper
• A non-speech audio CAPTCHA based on acoustic event detection and classification

  2016cites this paper
• Speeching: Mobile Crowdsourced Speech Assessment to Support Self-Monitoring and Management for People with Parkinson's

  2016cites this paper
• Intelligibility of synthetic speech in noise and reverberation

  2015influential citation
• Effect of trapping questions on the reliability of speech quality judgments in a crowdsourcing paradigm

  2015cites this paper
• Conducting spoken word recognition research online: Validation and a new timing method

  2015cites this paper
• Which Synthetic Voice Should I Choose for an Evocative Task?

  2015cites this paper
• Are we using enough listeners? no! - an empirically-supported critique of interspeech 2014 TTS evaluations

  2015cites this paper
• Robustness in speech quality assessment and temporal training expiry in mobile crowdsourcing environments

  2015cites this paper
• Exemplar-based voice conversion using joint nonnegative matrix factorization

  2015cites this paper
• Constructing Secure Audio CAPTCHAs by Exploiting Differences between Humans and Machines

  2015cites this paper
• Spectral mapping for voice conversion

  2015cites this paper
• Joint nonnegative matrix factorization for exemplar-based voice conversion

  2014cites this paper
• Concise Preservation by Combining Managed Forgetting and Contextualization Remembering

  2014cites this paper
• Exemplar-Based Sparse Representation With Residual Compensation for Voice Conversion

  2014cites this paper
• Crowdsourcing for Spoken Dialog System Evaluation

  2013cites this paper
• Intelligibility enhancement of synthetic speech in noise

  2013cites this paper
• Automatic word-level evaluation and error analysis of formant speech synthesis for Croatian

  2013cites this paper
• Evaluating Voice Quality and Speech Synthesis Using Crowdsourcing

  2013cites this paper
• Crowdsourced Assessment of Speech Synthesis

  2013cites this paper
• 1 Crowdsourcing for Spoken Dialog Systems Evaluation

  2012cites this paper
• 1 Crowdsourcing in Speech Perception

  2012influential citation
• Crowd-supervised training of spoken language systems

  2012cites this paper
• Impacts of machine translation and speech synthesis on speech-to-speech translation 著者(英)

  2012influential citation
• Overview of NIT HMM-based speech synthesis system for Blizzard Challenge 2012

  2012cites this paper
• Impacts of machine translation and speech synthesis on speech-to-speech translation

  2012influential citation
• Spoken dialogue interfaces for older people

  2012cites this paper
• Crowdsourcing Preference Tests, and How to Detect Cheating

  2011influential citation
• Overview of NIT HMM-based speech synthesis system for Blizzard Challenge 2011

  2011cites this paper
• Speaking to the Crowd: Looking at Past Achievements in Using Crowdsourcing for Speech and Predicting Future Challenges

  2011cites this paper
• Crowdsourcing for Word Recognition in Noise

  2011cites this paper
• Edinburgh Research Explorer Experimental evaluation of MOS, AB and BWS listening test designs

  year unknowncites this paper
• How do headphone checks impact perception data?

  year unknowncites this paper