BackgroundSerial analysis of gene expression using small amounts of starting material (microSAGE) has not yet been conclusively shown to be representative, reproducible or accurate.ResultsWe show that microSAGE is highly representative, reproducible and accurate, but that pronounced differences in gene expression are seen between tissue samples taken from different individuals.ConclusionsMicroSAGE is a reliable method of comprehensively profiling differences in gene expression among samples, but care should be taken in generalizing results obtained from libraries constructed from tissue obtained from different individuals and/or processed or stored differently.
MicroSAGE is highly representative and reproducible but reveals major differences in gene expression among samples obtained from similar tissues
S. Blackshaw,W. Kuo,P. Park,M. Tsujikawa,J. Gunnersen,H. Scott,W. Boon,S. Tan,C. Cepko
Published 2003 in Genome Biology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2003
- Venue
Genome Biology
- Publication date
2003-02-18
- Fields of study
Biology, Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-58 of 58 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-45 of 45 citing papers · Page 1 of 1