SCIENCE@home

Assessing the Quality of Wikipedia Pages Using Edit Longevity and Contributor Centrality

Xiangju Qin,P. Cunningham

Published 2012 in arXiv.org

ABSTRACT

In this paper we address the challenge of assessing the quality of Wikipedia pages using scores derived from edit contribution and con- tributor authoritativeness measures. The hypothesis is that pages with significant contributions from authoritative contributors are likely to be high-quality pages. Contributions are quantified using edit longevity measures and contributor authoritativeness is scored using centrality metrics in either the Wikipedia talk or co-author networks. The results suggest that it is useful to take into account the contributor authori- tativeness when assessing the information quality of Wikipedia content. The percentile visualization of the quality scores provides some insights about the anomalous articles, and can be used to help Wikipedia editors to identify Start and Stub articles that are of relatively good quality.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2012

  • Venue

    arXiv.org

  • Publication date

    2012-06-12

  • Fields of study

    Computer Science

  • Identifiers
    arXiv 1206.2517
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-20 of 20 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-8 of 8 citing papers · Page 1 of 1