Comparative analysis of clicks and judgments for IR evaluation

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2009

• Venue

  WSCD '09

• Publication date

  2009-02-09

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1145/1507509.1507522
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval

  2009cited by this paper
• How does clickthrough data reflect retrieval quality?

  2008cited by this paper
• Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries

  2008cited by this paper
• Bias and the limits of pooling for large collections

  2007cited by this paper
• Deriving a Domain Specific Test Collection from a Query Log

  2007cited by this paper
• Building simulated queries for known-item topics: an analysis using six european languages

  2007cited by this paper
• Search log analysis: What it is, what's been done, how to do it

  2006cited by this paper
• The Wikipedia XML corpus

  2006cited by this paper
• Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback

  2005cited by this paper
• Analysis of the query logs of a Web site search engine

  2005cited by this paper
• Understanding user goals in web search

  2004influential reference
• SIGIR 2003 workshop report: implicit measures of user interests and preferences

  2003cited by this paper
• Using titles and category names from editor-driven taxonomies for automatic evaluation

  2003cited by this paper
• Evaluating Retrieval Performance Using Clickthrough Data

  2003cited by this paper
• Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography

  2003cited by this paper
• A taxonomy of web search

  2002influential reference
• Automatic evaluation of world wide web search services

  2002cited by this paper
• Ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments

  2001cited by this paper
• Modeling Information Content Using Observable Behavior

  2001cited by this paper
• The Philosophy of Information Retrieval Evaluation

  2001cited by this paper
• A transaction log analysis of a digital library

  2000cited by this paper
• How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments?

  1998influential reference

• Validating Synthetic Usage Data in Living Lab Environments

  2023cites this paper
• TripJudge: A Relevance Judgement Test Collection for TripClick Health Retrieval

  2022cites this paper
• Building Test Collections: An Interactive Guide for Students and Others Without Their Own Evaluation Conference Series

  2017cites this paper
• A Usefulness-based Approach for Measuring the Local and Global Effect of IIR Services

  2016cites this paper
• MergeRUCB: A Method for Large-Scale Online Ranker Evaluation

  2015cites this paper
• Privacy aware social information retrieval and spam filtering using folksonomies

  2015cites this paper
• Dynamic Information Retrieval Modeling

  2015cites this paper
• Relative confidence sampling for efficient on-line ranker evaluation

  2014cites this paper
• Fast and reliable online learning to rank for information retrieval

  2013cites this paper
• Fidelity, Soundness, and Efficiency of Interleaved Comparison Methods

  2013cites this paper
• Building test collections: an interactive tutorial for students and others without their own evaluation conference series

  2013cites this paper
• On caption bias in interleaving experiments

  2012cites this paper
• Estimating interleaved comparison outcomes from historical click data

  2012cites this paper
• An analysis of human factors and label accuracy in crowdsourcing relevance judgments

  2012cites this paper
• Latent variable modelling of user interaction in image retrieval

  2011cites this paper
• Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation

  2010cites this paper
• Improving quality of training data for learning to rank using click-through data

  2010cites this paper
• Student Use of the Wikipedia

  2009cites this paper
• Visualizing the problems with the INEX topics

  2009cites this paper