Calculating the probability of random sampling for continuous variables in submitted or published randomised controlled trials

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Anaesthesia

• Publication date

  2015-07-01

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/anae.13126PMID 26032950
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

  2014cited by this paper
• On statistical methods to test if sampling in trials is genuinely random

  2012cited by this paper
• The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity

  2012cited by this paper
• Publication bias, retrospective bias, and reproducibility of significant results in observational studies.

  2012cited by this paper
• Lies, damn lies, and statistics *

  2012cited by this paper
• Fraud or flawed: adverse impact of fabricated or poor quality research

  2010cited by this paper
• Unusual clustering of coefficients of variation in published articles from a medical biochemistry department in India

  2009cited by this paper
• Dose-response characteristics of midazolam for reducing diaphragmatic contractility.

  2001cited by this paper
• Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

  1997cited by this paper
• Adjustment during army life

  1977cited by this paper

• Critical commentary on: "Effect of levothyroxine on miscarriage among women with normal thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity undergoing In Vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial"

  2026cites this paper
• Detecting Inconsistencies and Fraud in Research Data: Time for Authors to Share the Data Underlying Their Summary Statistics as a Matter of Course.

  2025cites this paper
• Exposing the Reproducibility Crisis and Scientific Misconduct: Evolution of Learning From Published Books.

  2025cites this paper
• Enhancing transparency in reporting clinical trials: CONSORT 2025.

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research.

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research.

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research.

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research.

  2025cites this paper
• Data-sharing and trustworthiness of trials evaluating cervical ripening in induction of labour: a meta-epidemiological study of randomised controlled trials

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anaesthesiology research*

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research

  2025cites this paper
• Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author-group.

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research.

  2025cites this paper
• Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research

  2025cites this paper
• Concerns about data integrity across 263 papers by one author.

  2024cites this paper
• Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions

  2024cites this paper
• Conflicts of Interest Anesthesia Practice: Relationships with Industry, Responsibility to the Health Care System, and Research Integrity.

  2024cites this paper
• Statistical Techniques to Assess Publication Integrity in Groups of Randomised Trials: A Narrative Review.

  2024cites this paper
• Prophylactic antibiotics for manual removal of retained placenta in vaginal birth.

  2024cites this paper
• Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment

  2023cites this paper
• Position statement from the Editors of Anaesthesia and Anaesthesia Reports on best practice in academic medical publishing.

  2023cites this paper
• Adlocutio cohortium: Introduction of a New Editor-in-Chief.

  2023cites this paper
• and Adult

  2022cites this paper
• Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review

  2022cites this paper
• Establishing an environment in which rigorous scientific inquiry is practiced: a personal journey

  2022cites this paper
• Automated detection of over- and under-dispersion in baseline tables in randomised controlled trials

  2022cites this paper
• The trustworthiness and impact of trial preprints for COVID-19 decision-making: A methodological study

  2022cites this paper
• Quality criteria for randomized controlled studies: Obstetric Journal Guidelines.

  2021cites this paper
• Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review.

  2021cites this paper
• Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials

  2021cites this paper
• Concerns about Data Integrity of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials in Women's Health

  2021cites this paper
• To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?

  2020cites this paper
• Diagnosing fraudulent baseline data in clinical trials

  2020cites this paper
• False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia

  2020cites this paper
• Gap Analysis of Swine-Based Hemostasis Research: "Houses of Brick or Mansions of Straw?"

  2020cites this paper
• Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions.

  2020cites this paper
• Randomised controlled trials evaluating endometrial scratching: assessment of methodological issues.

  2019cites this paper
• Rounding, but not randomization method, non-normality, or correlation, affected baseline P-value distributions in randomized trials.

  2019cites this paper
• Falling Dominoes.

  2019cites this paper
• Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis

  2019cites this paper
• Contributions towards understanding and building sustainable science

  2019cites this paper
• Collecting data

  2019cites this paper
• Editorial Views and Policies.

  2018cites this paper
• Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity – a reply

  2018cites this paper
• Fehlerhafte Daten in randomisierten Studien: Statistik kann sie aufdecken

  2018influential citation
• Validity of Tests

  2018cites this paper
• Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity

  2018cites this paper
• Author response: Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials

  2018cites this paper
• Minimising ‘research waste’ in academic anaesthesia funding and outputs

  2018cites this paper
• Journal response: prospective clinical trial registration – desirable, but not necessary

  2018cites this paper
• Caveat scriptor

  2018cites this paper
• An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii

  2018cites this paper
• Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals

  2017cites this paper
• What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification

  2017cites this paper
• Issues in the statistical detection of data fabrication and data errors in the scientific literature: simulation study and reanalysis of Carlisle, 2017

  2017cites this paper
• Errors and Integrity in Seeking and Reporting Apparent Research Misconduct.

  2017cites this paper
• Widening the search for suspect data – is the flood of retractions about to become a tsunami?

  2017cites this paper
• An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud

  2017cites this paper
• The fate of manuscripts rejected from Anaesthesia

  2017cites this paper
• Application of Benford’s law: a valuable tool for detecting scientific papers with fabricated data?

  2017cites this paper
• Adenosine versus intravenous calcium channel antagonists for supraventricular tachycardia.

  2017cites this paper
• International publication trends originating from anaesthetic departments from 2001 to 2015

  2017cites this paper
• Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh

  2017cites this paper
• Between evidence and commerce – the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems

  2017cites this paper
• Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.

  2016cites this paper
• Deaths by horsekick in the Prussian army – and other ‘Never Events’ in large organisations

  2016cites this paper
• The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication

  2016cites this paper
• Research practices and assessment of research misconduct

  2016cites this paper
• The Risks to Patient Privacy from Publishing Data from Clinical Anesthesia Studies

  2016cites this paper
• [Fraud in scientific research papers: Playing the «cops and robbers» game].

  2015cites this paper
• Problematic trial detection in ClinicalTrials.gov

  2015cites this paper
• Probability screening in manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals – an effective tool or a statistical quagmire?

  2015cites this paper