Mortality Risk Prediction: Can Comorbidity Indices Be Improved With Psychosocial Data?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Medical Care

• Publication date

  2015-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000428PMID 26421372PMCID PMC4658312
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Why Summary Comorbidity Measures Such As the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Score Work

  2015cited by this paper
• Personality-informed interventions for healthy aging: conclusions from a National Institute on Aging work group.

  2014cited by this paper
• The contribution of educational class in improving accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction across European regions: The MORGAM Project Cohort Component

  2014cited by this paper
• Improving long-term prediction of first cardiovascular event: the contribution of family history of coronary heart disease and social status.

  2014cited by this paper
• Hierarchical Structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory in a Large Population Sample: Goldberg's Trait-Tier Mapping Procedure.

  2013cited by this paper
• Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine

  2011cited by this paper
• Predicting death: an empirical evaluation of predictive tools for mortality.

  2011influential reference
• Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis Using Stata: Beyond the Cox Model

  2011cited by this paper
• Rethinking Social Desirability Scales

  2010cited by this paper
• Intelligence, education, and mortality

  2010cited by this paper
• Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures

  2010cited by this paper
• Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

  2010cited by this paper
• Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death

  2010cited by this paper
• Including Socioeconomic Status in Coronary Heart Disease Risk Estimation

  2010cited by this paper
• The path to personalized medicine.

  2010cited by this paper
• Small-sample precision of ROC-related estimates

  2010cited by this paper
• Unraveling human complexity and disease with systems biology and personalized medicine.

  2010cited by this paper
• Use of Framingham risk score and new biomarkers to predict cardiovascular mortality in older people: population based observational cohort study

  2009cited by this paper
• Genomic and personalized medicine: foundations and applications.

  2009cited by this paper
• Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine?

  2009cited by this paper
• Adding socioeconomic status to Framingham scoring to reduce disparities in coronary risk assessment.

  2009cited by this paper
• Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model

  2009cited by this paper
• Alpha, Dimension-Free, and Model-Based Internal Consistency Reliability

  2009cited by this paper
• A Modification of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures Into a Point System for Hospital Death Using Administrative Data

  2009cited by this paper
• Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?

  2009cited by this paper
• Comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by M. J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929)

  2008cited by this paper
• Comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by M. J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929)

  2008cited by this paper
• The need for reorientation toward cost‐effective prediction: Comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929)

  2008cited by this paper
• The need for reorientation toward cost‐effective prediction: Comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by M. J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929)

  2008cited by this paper
• Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond

  2008cited by this paper
• Prognosis research: toward evidence-based results and a Cochrane methods group.

  2007cited by this paper
• The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years

  2007cited by this paper
• Perceived social support and mortality in older people.

  2006cited by this paper
• Cognition and All-Cause Mortality Across the Entire Adult Age Range: Health and Lifestyle Survey

  2006cited by this paper
• Social Epidemiology

  2005cited by this paper
• Use of a Self-Report-Generated Charlson Comorbidity Index for Predicting Mortality

  2005cited by this paper
• Clinician predictions of intensive care unit mortality*

  2004cited by this paper
• Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo Methods of Comorbidity Measurement in Administrative Data

  2004cited by this paper
• The path to personalized medicine.

  2002cited by this paper
• How accurate are physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review.

  2001cited by this paper
• The immunological effects of thought suppression.

  1998cited by this paper
• Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review?

  1996cited by this paper
• Do socioeconomic differences in mortality persist after retirement? 25 Year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study

  1996cited by this paper
• Personality and attitudinal correlates of healthy and unhealthy lifestyles in young adults.

  1994cited by this paper
• A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

  1987cited by this paper
• The Genesis of the Registrar-General's Social Classification of Occupations

  1984cited by this paper
• Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies

  1983cited by this paper
• The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. I. Methods and risk factors.

  1978cited by this paper
• Edinburgh Research Explorer Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities

  year unknowncited by this paper
• Performance of Common Genetic Variants in Breast-cancer Risk Models

  year unknowncited by this paper

• The less lonely and the more satisfied you are, the merrier is … the heart!

  2025cites this paper
• Systematic review on the instruments used for measuring the association of the level of multimorbidity and clinically important outcomes

  2021cites this paper
• Health Risk Prediction Models Incorporating Personality Data: Motivation, Challenges, and Illustration

  2019cites this paper
• Social support in cancer: How do patients want us to help?

  2019cites this paper
• A Validation Study of the Mini-IPIP Five-Factor Personality Scale in Adults With Cancer

  2019cites this paper
• A validation study of the CirCom comorbidity score in an English cirrhosis population using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

  2018cites this paper
• Relationship between the FRAX index and physical and cognitive functioning in older people

  2018cites this paper
• Infection Control Practices and Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin Infections: A Survey of Students in US Chiropractic Programs

  2018cites this paper
• Crooks, Colin J. and Card, Timothy R. and West, Joe (2016) The use of a bayesian hierarchy to develop and validate a co-morbidity score to predict mortality for linked primary and secondary care data from the NHS

  2017cites this paper
• The Thick of It: Freely Wandering in Academic Medicine.

  2017cites this paper
• Comparative Performance of Diagnosis-based and Prescription-based Comorbidity Scores to Predict Health-related Quality of Life

  2016cites this paper
• Open Peer Commentary and Author's Response

  2016cites this paper
• Personality and Perceived Health in Spousal Caregivers of Patients with Lung Cancer: The Roles of Neuroticism and Extraversion

  2016cites this paper
• The Use of a Bayesian Hierarchy to Develop and Validate a Co-Morbidity Score to Predict Mortality for Linked Primary and Secondary Care Data from the NHS in England

  2016cites this paper
• Personality traits and emotional patterns in irritable bowel syndrome.

  2016cites this paper
• Chiropractic Student Infection Control Practices and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin Infections

  2016influential citation