The Third Way: Reflections on Helen Longino’s The Fate of Knowledge

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2002

• Venue

  Philosophia Scientiæ

• Publication date

  2002-12-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Philosophy

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1086/344617
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Knowledge in a Social World

  2001cited by this paper
• The Fate of Knowledge

  2001cited by this paper
• Some Pictures are Worth 2[aleph]0 Sentences

  2000cited by this paper
• The Dappled World

  2000cited by this paper
• The Advancement of Science

  1993cited by this paper
• Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach

  1991cited by this paper
• Some Pictures Are Worth 2 א 0 Sentences

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Individual and collective epistemic virtue in science

  2026cites this paper
• Transformative Transdisciplinarity

  2025cites this paper
• Gatekeeping in interdisciplinary fields: the case of paleontology after the Modern Synthesis

  2025cites this paper
• Theology as social knowledge

  2025cites this paper
• What counts as relevant criticism? Longino's critical contextual empiricism and the feminist criticism of mainstream economics.

  2024cites this paper
• A Non-Ideal Theory of Knowledge

  2024cites this paper
• Scientific Progress and Democratic Society through the Lens of Scientific Pluralism

  2023influential citation
• Is knowledge a social phenomenon?

  2022cites this paper
• An infrastructural account of scientific objectivity for legal contexts and bloodstain pattern analysis

  2021influential citation
• Understanding, Truth, and Epistemic Goals

  2020cites this paper
• Objectivity and orgasm: the perils of imprecise definitions

  2020cites this paper
• The Multidimensional Epistemology of Computer Simulations: Novel Issues and the Need to Avoid the Drunkard’s Search Fallacy

  2019cites this paper
• The Social Epistemology of Consensus and Dissent

  2019cites this paper
• Social aspects of scientific knowledge

  2018cites this paper
• Social aspects of scientific knowledge

  2018cites this paper
• Scientific Pluralism and Inconsistency Toleration

  2017influential citation
• Identifying Difference, Engaging Dissent: What is at Stake in Democratizing Knowledge?

  2016cites this paper
• Risk, Uncertainty, and the Dimensions of Technological Rationality

  2015cites this paper
• Social Objectivity Under Scrutiny in the Pasteur–Pouchet Debate

  2015cites this paper
• Towards Democratic Models of Science: Exploring the Case of Scientific Pluralism

  2015cites this paper
• Towards Democratic Models of Science: Exploring the Case of Scientific Pluralism

  2015influential citation
• Simulation, Representation, and Cartography: Compiling a Virtual Atlas

  2015cites this paper
• Social Objectivity Under Scrutiny in the Pasteur–Pouchet Debate

  2015cites this paper
• Are there limits to scientists’ obligations to seek and engage dissenters?

  2014cites this paper
• Identifying Difference, Engaging Dissent: What is at Stake in Democratizing Knowledge?

  2014cites this paper
• Two Millian Arguments: Using Helen Longino's Approach to Solve the Problems Philip Kitcher Targeted with His Argument on Freedom of Inquiry

  2013cites this paper
• The rationality of scientific reasoning in the context of pursuit: Drawing appropriate distinctions

  2012cites this paper
• Pluralism and objectivity: Exposing and breaking a circle

  2012cites this paper
• What Is There Beyond Mertonian and Dollar Green Science? Exploring the Contours of Epistemic Democracy

  2012cites this paper
• Diversity and Dissent in the Social Sciences

  2011cites this paper
• What can democratic theory teach us about scientific pluralism, objectivity and consensus?

  2011cites this paper
• Feminist philosophy of science: history, contributions, and challenges

  2010cites this paper
• Personal interviews in cultural consumer research – post‐structuralist challenges

  2009cites this paper
• Standards and the distribution of cognitive labour: A model of the dynamics of scientific activity

  2009cites this paper
• Science as socially distributed cognition: Bridging philosophy and sociology of science

  2009cites this paper
• Diversity and the Fate of Objectivity

  2009cites this paper
• The Problem With(out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism

  2009cites this paper
• Yhteisöllinen objektiivisuus : tiedon kohtalo Helen E. Longinon teoriassa

  2009cites this paper
• Instituting Science: Discovery or Construction of Scientific Knowledge?

  2008cites this paper
• Valuing and evaluating evidence in medicine.

  2008cites this paper
• Naturalism & Objectivity: Methods and Meta-methods

  2008cites this paper
• Aspectos Cognitivos E Sociais Das Práticas Científicas

  2008cites this paper
• A New Way of Thinking about Social Location in Science

  2008cites this paper
• Science as Public Sphere?

  2007cites this paper
• Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle: What the Privatization of Science Can Teach Us About Social Epistemology

  2007cites this paper
• Qualitative Marketing Research: A Cultural Approach

  2006cites this paper
• On the Interplay of the Cognitive and the Social in Scientific Practices

  2005cites this paper
• Feminism, Epistemology & Morality

  2005cites this paper
• Inconsistency, Asymmetry, and Non-Locality

  2005cites this paper
• Again, What the Philosophy of Biology is not

  2005cites this paper
• Boundary Work and the Science Wars: James Robert Brown's Who Rules in Science?

  2005cites this paper
• The Effortless Economy of Science

  2004cites this paper
• The scientific dimensions of social knowledge and their distant echoes in 20th-century American philosophy of science

  2004cites this paper
• Refusing the Gift

  2001cites this paper
• Re-engineering Scientific Credit in the Era of the Globalized Information Economy

  2001cites this paper