Myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the stratification of perioperative and long-term risks

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Economics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.15275/KREATKARD.2016.01.03
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparison of modern risk scores in predicting operative mortality for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

  2016cited by this paper
• Accuracy of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

  2015cited by this paper
• Predictors of Failure in Fast-Track Cardiac Surgery.

  2015cited by this paper
• Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease.

  2014cited by this paper
• Validation of EuroSCORE II risk model for coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients

  2014cited by this paper
• [Comparison of standard Euroscore, logistic Euroscore and Euroscore II in prediction of early mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting].

  2013cited by this paper
• Validation of EuroSCORE II in a modern cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

  2013cited by this paper
• Dynamic trends in cardiac surgery: why the logistic EuroSCORE is no longer suitable for contemporary cardiac surgery and implications for future risk models.

  2013cited by this paper
• The revised EuroSCORE II for the prediction of mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

  2013cited by this paper
• The rationale for Heart Team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease.

  2013cited by this paper
• Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II.

  2013cited by this paper
• Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial.

  2013cited by this paper
• Validation of EuroSCORE II on a single-centre 3800 patient cohort.

  2013cited by this paper
• Which is more enduring--FAME or COURAGE?

  2012cited by this paper
• Combined anatomical and clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score.

  2012cited by this paper
• Performance of the original EuroSCORE.

  2012cited by this paper
• Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

  2012cited by this paper
• How does EuroSCORE II perform in UK cardiac surgery; an analysis of 23 740 patients from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National Database

  2012cited by this paper
• EuroSCORE II.

  2012cited by this paper
• Appropriateness of coronary revascularization for patients without acute coronary syndromes.

  2012cited by this paper
• Risk profile and 3-year outcomes from the SYNTAX percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting nested registries.

  2012cited by this paper
• Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.

  2012cited by this paper
• SYNTAX Score Reproducibility and Variability Between Interventional Cardiologists, Core Laboratory Technicians, and Quantitative Coronary Measurements

  2011cited by this paper
• Informed consent for interventions in stable coronary artery disease: problems, etiologies, and solutions.

  2011cited by this paper
• Complex coronary anatomy in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: impact of complex coronary anatomy in modern bypass surgery? Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial after two years.

  2011cited by this paper
• Value of Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF Score) in Assessing Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the ‘All-Comers' LEADERS Trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.

  2011cited by this paper
• Adherence of Catheterization Laboratory Cardiologists to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: What Happens in Actual Practice?

  2010cited by this paper
• Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

  2010cited by this paper
• Risk of Assessing Mortality Risk in Elective Cardiac Operations: Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction, and the Law of Parsimony

  2010cited by this paper
• The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

  2009cited by this paper
• Drug-eluting stents and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with class I indications for coronary artery bypass surgery undergoing index revascularization: analysis from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).

  2009cited by this paper
• The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

  2009cited by this paper
• Coronary artery bypass graft vs. percutaneous coronary angioplasty: CABG on the rebound?

  2007cited by this paper
• Cost effectiveness of clinically appropriate decisions on alternative treatments for angina pectoris: prospective observational study

  2007cited by this paper
• Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery.

  2006cited by this paper
• [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions].

  2006cited by this paper
• Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

  2003cited by this paper
• The logistic EuroSCORE

  2003cited by this paper
• European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE).

  1999cited by this paper

• Formation and evolution of surgical methods for treatment of stable coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction (review of literature)

  2023cites this paper
• Factors of unfavorable prognosis for myocardial and coronary revascularization using hybrid and step-by-step percutaneous interventions and carotid endarterectomy

  2022cites this paper
• Discrepancy between the European clinical guidelines and myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease in Russia.

  2018cites this paper
• Comorbidity in predicting the long-term outcomes of myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease

  2018cites this paper
• Long-term outcomes of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with coronary artery disease

  2018cites this paper
• Analysis of the immediate results of myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease

  2017cites this paper