SCIENCE@home

Analysis of a summary network of co-infection in humans reveals that parasites interact most via shared resources

Emily C. Griffiths,A. B. Pedersen,A. Fenton,Owen L. Petchey

Published 2014 in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

ABSTRACT

Simultaneous infection by multiple parasite species (viruses, bacteria, helminths, protozoa or fungi) is commonplace. Most reports show co-infected humans to have worse health than those with single infections. However, we have little understanding of how co-infecting parasites interact within human hosts. We used data from over 300 published studies to construct a network that offers the first broad indications of how groups of co-infecting parasites tend to interact. The network had three levels comprising parasites, the resources they consume and the immune responses they elicit, connected by potential, observed and experimentally proved links. Pairs of parasite species had most potential to interact indirectly through shared resources, rather than through immune responses or other parasites. In addition, the network comprised 10 tightly knit groups, eight of which were associated with particular body parts, and seven of which were dominated by parasite–resource links. Reported co-infection in humans is therefore structured by physical location within the body, with bottom-up, resource-mediated processes most often influencing how, where and which co-infecting parasites interact. The many indirect interactions show how treating an infection could affect other infections in co-infected patients, but the compartmentalized structure of the network will limit how far these indirect effects are likely to spread.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

CONCEPTS

REFERENCES

Showing 1-83 of 83 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-100 of 100 citing papers · Page 1 of 1