Comparative Effectiveness of Chemical, Biological or Combination of Both Mosquito Larvicides for Dengue Control in George Town, Penang, Malaysia – A Field Trial

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research

• Publication date

  2017-12-15

• Fields of study

  Geography, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.9734/JAMMR/2017/38224
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Community-Effectiveness of Temephos for Dengue Vector Control: A Systematic Literature Review

  2015cited by this paper
• Field Efficacy of Vectobac GR as a Mosquito Larvicide for the Control of Anopheline and Culicine Mosquitoes in Natural Habitats in Benin, West Africa

  2014cited by this paper
• Epidemiology of Dengue Disease in Malaysia (2000–2012): A Systematic Literature Review

  2014cited by this paper
• Climate change, environmental temperature change, and resistance to insecticides of dengue mosquito.

  2013cited by this paper
• Aedes albopictus control with spray application of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis, strain AM 65-52.

  2010cited by this paper
• Susceptibility of field-collected Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and temephos.

  2010cited by this paper
• Initial and Residual Activity of VectoBac® 12 AS, VectoBac® WDG, and VectoLex® WDG for Control of Mosquitoes in Ararat Valley, Turkey

  2009cited by this paper
• Laboratory evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis (Vectobac WDG) against mosquito larvae, Culex pipiens and Culiseta longiareolata.

  2008cited by this paper
• Efficacy of Vectobac DT and Culinexcombi Against Mosquito Larvae in Unused Swimming Pools in Malindi, Kenya

  2008cited by this paper
• Impact of larviciding with a Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis formulation, VectoBac WG, on dengue mosquito vectors in a dengue endemic site in Selangor State, Malaysia.

  2008influential reference
• Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis, VectoBac WG and DT, formulations against dengue mosquito vectors in cement potable water jars in Cambodia.

  2007cited by this paper
• [Effectiveness of aerial application of VectoBac G larvicide granules against mosquitoes in the Olomouc region in spring 2006].

  2007cited by this paper
• Persistence of Vectobac WDG and Metoprag S-2G against Aedes aegypti larvae using a semi-field bioassay in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

  2005cited by this paper
• Efficacy of a Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis tablet formulation, vectobac DT, for control of dengue mosquito vectors in potable water containers.

  2005cited by this paper
• Efficacy studies of Vectobac 12as and Teknar HP-D larvicides against 3rd-instar Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus and Culex quinquefasciatus in small plot field studies.

  2004cited by this paper
• Effects of sublethal concentrations of Vectobac on biological parameters of Aedes aegypti.

  2004cited by this paper
• Influence of temperature and concentration of VectoBac on control of the salt-marsh mosquito, Ochlerotatus squamiger, in Monterey County, California.

  2004cited by this paper
• Efficacy of VectoBac (Bacillus thuringiensis variety israelensis) Formulations for Mosquito Control in Australia

  2003cited by this paper
• A semifield evaluation of Vectobac DT (ABG-6499), a new formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis for control of Aedes albopictus.

  2003cited by this paper
• Laboratory evaluation of Vectobac as against Aedes aegypti in Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.

  2002cited by this paper
• Indoor thermal fogging against vector mosquitoes with two Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis formulations, Vectobac ABG 6511 water-dispersible granules and Vectobac 12AS liquid.

  2002cited by this paper
• Efficacy of aqueous suspension and granular formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis (Vectobac) against mosquito vectors.

  2000cited by this paper
• Laboratory and field evaluation of efficacy of VectoBac 12AS against Culex sitiens (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae.

  1998cited by this paper
• Performance of ULV formulations (Pesguard 102/Vectobac 12AS) against three mosquito species.

  1997cited by this paper
• Field evaluation of Vectobac G, Vectobac 12AS and Bactimos WP against the dengue vector Aedes albopictus in tires.

  1997cited by this paper
• Field trials with Vectolex (Bacillus sphaericus) and Vectobac (Bacillus thuringiensis (H-14)) against Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus breeding in Zaire.

  1991cited by this paper
• Field efficacy of Vectobac-12AS and Vectobac-24AS against black fly larvae in New Brunswick streams (Diptera: Simuliidae).

  1990cited by this paper
• Efficacy of Duplex and Vectobac against Psorophora columbiae and Anopheles quadrimaculatus larvae in Arkansas ricefields.

  1989cited by this paper

• Genetic engineering and bacterial pathogenesis against the vectorial capacity of mosquitoes.

  2020cites this paper