An increasing number of environmental protection programs offers financial compensation to farmers in exchange for conservation services. Incentive-compatible contracts can be designed to mitigate excess compensation, but the extant literature suggests that outcomes are always second-best so that other instruments (such as conservation auctions) may be preferred. We argue that the claim regarding the first-best solution never being incentive-compatible is correct if all conservation costs are variable in nature; if there are fixed costs too, the first-best compensation scheme may be incentive-compatible after all. Given the relevance of fixed costs in conservation issues, we conclude that incentive-compatible contracts should be given a second chance as a policy measure to induce conservation.
Optimal Conservation Programs, Asymmetric Information and the Role of Fixed Costs
Published 2011 in Environmental and Resource Economics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2011
- Venue
Environmental and Resource Economics
- Publication date
2011-04-17
- Fields of study
Economics, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-36 of 36 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-25 of 25 citing papers · Page 1 of 1