Do Pigeons (Columba livia) Use Information About the Absence of Food Appropriately? A Further Look Into Suboptimal Choice

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Journal of Comparative Psychology

• Publication date

  2017-05-08

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1037/com0000079PMID 28481567
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Testing the boundaries of "paradoxical" predictions: Pigeons do disregard bad news.

  2016cited by this paper
• When good news leads to bad choices.

  2016cited by this paper
• Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.

  2016cited by this paper
• Resolving the paradox of suboptimal choice.

  2016cited by this paper
• Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies

  2016cited by this paper
• The effect of response rate on reward value in a self-control task.

  2015cited by this paper
• Suboptimal Choice by Pigeons: Evidence that the Value of the Conditioned Reinforcer Rather than its Frequency Determines Choice

  2015cited by this paper
• When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes.

  2015cited by this paper
• Irrational choice and the value of information

  2015cited by this paper
• Suboptimal choice by pigeons may result from the diminishing effect of nonreinforcement.

  2014cited by this paper
• Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior.

  2014cited by this paper
• Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.

  2012cited by this paper
• Modelling Natural Action Selection: Do we expect natural selection to produce rational behaviour?

  2011cited by this paper
• Sub-Optimal Choice by Pigeons: Failure to Support The Allais Paradox.

  2011cited by this paper
• Whisker: A client—server high-performance multimedia research control system

  2010cited by this paper
• Suboptimal choice behavior by pigeons

  2010cited by this paper
• The adaptive nature of impulsivity.

  2010cited by this paper
• Why do animals make better choices in patch-leaving problems?

  2009cited by this paper
• Sequential and simultaneous choices: testing the diet selection and sequential choice models.

  2009cited by this paper
• Effects of reinforcer delay and variability in a successive-encounters procedure

  2008cited by this paper
• Foraging : behavior and ecology

  2007cited by this paper
• Choice in a successive-encounters procedure and hyperbolic decay of reinforcement.

  2007cited by this paper
• OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR THEORIES OF PROBABILISTIC REINFORCEMENT

  2005cited by this paper
• OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR BEHAVIORS OBSERVED DURING SIN A SIMPLE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING TASK '

  2005cited by this paper
• OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR CHOICE WITH PROBABILISTIC REINFORCEMENT : EFFECTS OF DELAY AND CONDITIONED REINFORCERS

  2005cited by this paper
• OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR CHOICE AND FORAGING

  2005cited by this paper
• Impulsiveness without discounting: the ecological rationality hypothesis

  2004cited by this paper
• Choice and context: Testing a simple short-term choice rule

  2003cited by this paper
• The adaptive value of preference for immediacy: when shortsighted rules have farsighted consequences

  2001cited by this paper
• Rate currencies and the foraging starling: the fallacy of the averages revisited

  1996cited by this paper
• Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.

  1996cited by this paper
• Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.

  1995cited by this paper
• Determinants of pigeons’ choice between certain and probabilistic outcomes

  1994cited by this paper
• Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.

  1990cited by this paper
• Foraging decisions: patch choice and exploitation by pigeons

  1989cited by this paper
• Foraging decisions: prey choice by pigeons

  1989cited by this paper
• Foraging as Operant Behavior and Operant Behavior as Foraging: What Have We Learned?

  1988cited by this paper
• Choice and foraging: the effects of accessibility on acceptability.

  1988cited by this paper
• Sensitivity of pigeons to prereinforcer and postreinforcer delay

  1985cited by this paper
• Percentage reward in an operant analogue to foraging

  1985cited by this paper
• The acquisition of observing.

  1982cited by this paper
• Foraging and reinforcement schedules in the pigeon: Optimal and non-optimal aspects of choice

  1979cited by this paper
• Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

  1974cited by this paper

• Do goldfish like to be informed?

  2024cites this paper
• Rats’ performance in a suboptimal choice procedure implemented in a natural-foraging analogue

  2024influential citation
• To know or not to know? Curiosity and the value of prospective information in animals

  2024cites this paper
• Time, uncertainty, and suboptimal choice.

  2023cites this paper
• Paradoxical choice and the reinforcing value of information

  2022cites this paper
• The role of contingency discriminability in suboptimal choice.

  2021cites this paper
• Uncertainty avoidance versus conditioned reinforcement: exploring paradoxical choice in rats

  2021cites this paper
• The functional equivalence of two variants of the suboptimal choice task: choice proportion and response latency as measures of value

  2020cites this paper
• Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates

  2020cites this paper
• A Temporal Information-Theoretic Model of Suboptimal Choice

  2020cites this paper
• The Δ-∑ hypothesis: How contrast and reinforcement rate combine to generate suboptimal choice.

  2020cites this paper
• Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing.

  2020cites this paper
• Testing the Δ-∑ hypothesis in the suboptimal choice task: Same delta with different probabilities of reinforcement.

  2020cites this paper
• The functional equivalence of two variants of the suboptimal choice task: choice proportion and response latency as measures of value

  2020cites this paper
• Rats' optimal choice behavior in a gambling-like task.

  2019cites this paper
• Conditioned inhibition: Historical critiques and controversies in the light of recent advances.

  2019cites this paper
• Frequency and value both matter in the suboptimal choice procedure.

  2019cites this paper
• Rats' preferences in the suboptimal choice procedure: Evaluating the impact of reinforcement probability and conditioned inhibitors.

  2018cites this paper
• Suboptimal Choice, Reward-Predictive Signals, and Temporal Information

  2018cites this paper
• Ultimate explanations and suboptimal choice.

  2018cites this paper