Birth defects and environmental exposures: logical, diabolical or the devil is in the details?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Environmental Research

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Chemistry, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2012.10.006PMID 23127493
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparison of defects identified through Minnesota's Birth Defects Information System And Vital Records, 2006-2008.

  2012cited by this paper
• The association between mountaintop mining and birth defects among live births in central Appalachia, 1996-2003.

  2011cited by this paper
• Sensitivity of Birth Certificate Reports of Birth Defects in Atlanta, 1995–2005: Effects of Maternal, Infant, and Hospital Characteristics

  2011cited by this paper
• Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006.

  2010cited by this paper
• National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999-2001.

  2006cited by this paper
• Perinatal epidemiologic research with vital statistics data: validity is the essential quality.

  2005cited by this paper
• Invited commentary: using vital statistics databases for perinatal epidemiology: does the quality go in before the name goes on?

  2001cited by this paper
• The quality of data reported on birth certificates.

  1997cited by this paper
• The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate.

  1996cited by this paper

• Are residents of mountain-top mining counties more likely to have infants with birth defects? The West Virginia experience.

  2015cites this paper