Altruistic punishment following social norm violations promotes human cooperation. However, experimental evidence indicates that some forms of punishment are spiteful rather than altruistic. Using two types of punishment games and seven non-strategic games, we identified strong behavioural differences between altruistic and spiteful punishers. Altruistic punishers who rejected unfair offers in the ultimatum game and punished norm violators in the third-party punishment game behaved pro-socially in various non-strategic games. Spiteful punishers who rejected unfair offers in the ultimatum game but did not punish norm violators in the third-party punishment game behaved selfishly in non-strategic games. In addition, the left caudate nucleus was larger in spiteful punishers than in altruistic punishers. These findings are in contrast to the previous assumption that altruistic punishers derive pleasure from enforcement of fairness norms, and suggest that spiteful punishers derive pleasure from seeing the target experience negative consequences.
Behavioural Differences and Neural Substrates of Altruistic and Spiteful Punishment
T. Yamagishi,Yang Li,A. Fermin,R. Kanai,Haruto Takagishi,Yoshie Matsumoto,T. Kiyonari,M. Sakagami
Published 2017 in Scientific Reports
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
Scientific Reports
- Publication date
2017-11-07
- Fields of study
Medicine, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-32 of 32 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-26 of 26 citing papers · Page 1 of 1